PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-12400F

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +98.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (18 MB vs 9 MB).
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of BGA1440 and DDR4.
✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-8750H.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $174 MSRP, while Core i7-8750H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-8750H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i7-8750H

2018

Why buy it

✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Core i5-12400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12400F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (9,769 vs 19,532).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (9 MB vs 18 MB).
❌Older platform position on BGA1440 with DDR4, while Core i5-12400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.

Core i5-12400F

2022

Core i7-8750H

2018

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +98.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (18 MB vs 9 MB).
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of BGA1440 and DDR4.
✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-8750H.

Why buy it

✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Core i5-12400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $174 MSRP, while Core i7-8750H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-8750H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12400F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (9,769 vs 19,532).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (9 MB vs 18 MB).
❌Older platform position on BGA1440 with DDR4, while Core i5-12400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-12400F better than Core i7-8750H?

Yes. Core i5-12400F is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 98.3% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data, 99.9% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-12400F is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 98.3% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-12400F is the better fit. You are getting 99.9% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (18 MB vs 9 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-12400F is the smarter buy today. Core i5-12400F is at an unclear MSRP at $174 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 98.3% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (112.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-12400F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2018), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of BGA1440, 100% larger total L3 cache (18 MB vs 9 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 6/12. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-12400F Benchmark Check

Core i7-8750H Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-12400F	Core i7-8750H
1080p
low	183 FPS	178 FPS
medium	168 FPS	145 FPS
high	139 FPS	117 FPS
ultra	119 FPS	93 FPS
1440p
low	153 FPS	150 FPS
medium	132 FPS	122 FPS
high	106 FPS	96 FPS
ultra	89 FPS	76 FPS
4K
low	87 FPS	70 FPS
medium	81 FPS	61 FPS
high	64 FPS	48 FPS
ultra	49 FPS	38 FPS

Open Core i5-12400F Open Core i7-8750H

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-12400F	Core i7-8750H
1080p
low	471 FPS	174 FPS
medium	397 FPS	150 FPS
high	341 FPS	141 FPS
ultra	301 FPS	123 FPS
1440p
low	407 FPS	156 FPS
medium	351 FPS	135 FPS
high	309 FPS	128 FPS
ultra	265 FPS	112 FPS
4K
low	282 FPS	137 FPS
medium	248 FPS	120 FPS
high	229 FPS	113 FPS
ultra	196 FPS	96 FPS

Open Core i5-12400F Open Core i7-8750H

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-12400F	Core i7-8750H
1080p
low	488 FPS	244 FPS
medium	488 FPS	244 FPS
high	488 FPS	244 FPS
ultra	488 FPS	244 FPS
1440p
low	488 FPS	244 FPS
medium	488 FPS	244 FPS
high	485 FPS	244 FPS
ultra	434 FPS	244 FPS
4K
low	442 FPS	244 FPS
medium	389 FPS	244 FPS
high	337 FPS	244 FPS
ultra	274 FPS	226 FPS

Open Core i5-12400F Open Core i7-8750H

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-12400F	Core i7-8750H
1080p
low	488 FPS	244 FPS
medium	488 FPS	244 FPS
high	488 FPS	244 FPS
ultra	488 FPS	244 FPS
1440p
low	488 FPS	244 FPS
medium	488 FPS	244 FPS
high	488 FPS	244 FPS
ultra	473 FPS	244 FPS
4K
low	488 FPS	244 FPS
medium	450 FPS	244 FPS
high	391 FPS	244 FPS
ultra	330 FPS	244 FPS

Open Core i5-12400F Open Core i7-8750H

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-12400F and Core i7-8750H

Core i5-12400F

The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.

Core i7-8750H

The Core i7-8750H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 9 MB. L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 9,769 points. Launch price was $395.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i5-12400F and Core i7-8750H share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F versus 4.1 GHz on the Core i7-8750H — a 7.1% clock advantage for the Core i5-12400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Core i5-12400F uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i7-8750H uses Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12400F scores 19,532 against the Core i7-8750H's 9,769 — a 66.6% lead for the Core i5-12400F. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F vs 9 MB on the Core i7-8750H.

Feature	Core i5-12400F	Core i7-8750H
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	6 / 12
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz+7%	4.1 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz+14%	2.2 GHz
L3 Cache	18 MB (total)+100%	9 MB
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+400%	256K (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Alder Lake-S (2022)	Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019)
PassMark	19,532+100%	9,769
Cinebench R23 Multi	12,380	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,700	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	657	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-12400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-8750H uses BGA1440 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-12400F versus DDR4-2666 on the Core i7-8750H — the Core i5-12400F supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-12400F supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-12400F) vs 16 (Core i7-8750H) — the Core i5-12400F offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	Core i5-12400F	Core i7-8750H
Socket	LGA1700	BGA1440
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+25%	DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB+100%	64 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	20+25%	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-8750H). The Core i7-8750H includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Core i5-12400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value, Core i7-8750H targets Mobile. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600.

Feature	Core i5-12400F	Core i7-8750H
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	UHD Graphics 630
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Gaming Performance/Value	Mobile