Core i5-12400F vs Core i9-7940X

Intel

Core i5-12400F

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2022

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Core i9-7940X

14 Cores28 Thrd165 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2017

Popular choices:

i5-12400F

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-12400F

2022

Why buy it

  • Costs $1,225 less on MSRP ($174 MSRP vs $1,399 MSRP).
  • Delivers 517.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 112.3 vs 18.2 PassMark/$ ($174 MSRP vs $1,399 MSRP).
  • Draws 65W instead of 165W, a 100W reduction.
  • Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2066 and DDR4.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (19,532 vs 25,452).

Core i9-7940X

2017

Why buy it

  • +30.3% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 18.2 vs 112.3 PassMark/$ ($1,399 MSRP vs $174 MSRP).
  • 153.8% higher power demand at 165W vs 65W.
  • Older platform position on LGA2066 with DDR4, while Core i5-12400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i9-7940X better than Core i5-12400F?
Yes. Core i9-7940X is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 1.5% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data and 30.3% better PassMark, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
Which one is better for gaming?
For gaming, the two CPUs are effectively a wash in the available data.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i9-7940X is the better fit. You are getting 30.3% better PassMark, backed by 14 cores and 28 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i9-7940X is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-12400F makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Core i9-7940X is 704.0% more expensive on MSRP at $1,399 MSRP versus $174 MSRP, and it gives you a 1.5% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-12400F is also 517.0% better value on MSRP (112.3 vs 18.2 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible LGA1700 + DDR5 setup, Core i5-12400F can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-12400F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2017) and a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA2066. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore i5-12400FCore i9-7940X
1080p
low183 FPS168 FPS
medium168 FPS148 FPS
high139 FPS116 FPS
ultra119 FPS97 FPS
1440p
low153 FPS141 FPS
medium132 FPS121 FPS
high106 FPS95 FPS
ultra89 FPS80 FPS
4K
low87 FPS79 FPS
medium81 FPS73 FPS
high64 FPS57 FPS
ultra49 FPS44 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore i5-12400FCore i9-7940X
1080p
low471 FPS446 FPS
medium397 FPS384 FPS
high341 FPS331 FPS
ultra301 FPS303 FPS
1440p
low407 FPS391 FPS
medium351 FPS344 FPS
high309 FPS298 FPS
ultra265 FPS261 FPS
4K
low282 FPS250 FPS
medium248 FPS219 FPS
high229 FPS205 FPS
ultra196 FPS179 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore i5-12400FCore i9-7940X
1080p
low488 FPS534 FPS
medium488 FPS451 FPS
high488 FPS409 FPS
ultra488 FPS365 FPS
1440p
low488 FPS485 FPS
medium488 FPS415 FPS
high485 FPS374 FPS
ultra434 FPS334 FPS
4K
low442 FPS379 FPS
medium389 FPS319 FPS
high337 FPS283 FPS
ultra274 FPS233 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore i5-12400FCore i9-7940X
1080p
low488 FPS636 FPS
medium488 FPS636 FPS
high488 FPS636 FPS
ultra488 FPS610 FPS
1440p
low488 FPS636 FPS
medium488 FPS636 FPS
high488 FPS573 FPS
ultra473 FPS500 FPS
4K
low488 FPS524 FPS
medium450 FPS475 FPS
high391 FPS418 FPS
ultra330 FPS364 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-12400F and Core i9-7940X

Intel

Core i5-12400F

The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.

Intel

Core i9-7940X

The Core i9-7940X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 19.25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 25,452 points. Launch price was $1,399.

Processing Power

The Core i5-12400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Core i9-7940X offers 14 cores / 28 threads — the Core i9-7940X has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F versus 4.4 GHz on the Core i9-7940X — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Core i5-12400F uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i9-7940X uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12400F scores 19,532 against the Core i9-7940X's 25,452 — a 26.3% lead for the Core i9-7940X. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F vs 19.25 MB (total) on the Core i9-7940X.

FeatureCore i5-12400FCore i9-7940X
Cores / Threads
6 / 12
14 / 28+133%
Boost Clock
4.4 GHz
4.4 GHz
Base Clock
2.5 GHz
3.1 GHz+24%
L3 Cache
18 MB (total)
19.25 MB (total)+7%
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)+25%
1 MB (per core)
Process
Intel 7 nm-50%
14 nm
Architecture
Alder Lake-S (2022)
Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark
19,532
25,452+30%
Cinebench R23 Multi
12,380
Geekbench 6 Single
1,700
Geekbench 6 Multi
657
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-12400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i9-7940X uses LGA2066 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i5-12400FCore i9-7940X
Socket
LGA1700
LGA2066
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F) / not specified (Core i9-7940X). Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600.

FeatureCore i5-12400FCore i9-7940X
Integrated GPU
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Gaming Performance/Value
💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-12400F launched at $174 MSRP, while the Core i9-7940X debuted at $1399. On MSRP ($174 vs $1399), the Core i5-12400F is $1225 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-12400F delivers 112.3 pts/$ vs 18.2 pts/$ for the Core i9-7940X — making the Core i5-12400F the 144.2% better value option.

FeatureCore i5-12400FCore i9-7940X
MSRP
$174-88%
$1399
Performance per Dollar
112.3+517%
18.2
Release Date
2022
2017