
Core i5-12400F
Popular choices:

Core i9-9990XE
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-12400F
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,826 less on MSRP ($174 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 644.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 112.3 vs 15.1 PassMark/$ ($174 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 255W, a 190W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2066 and DDR4.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i9-9990XE.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-9990XE across 37 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (657 vs 16,199).
Core i9-9990XE
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +25.0% higher average FPS across 37 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅120% more PCIe lanes (44 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.1 vs 112.3 PassMark/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $174 MSRP).
- ❌292.3% higher power demand at 255W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2066 with DDR4, while Core i5-12400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Core i5-12400F
2022Core i9-9990XE
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,826 less on MSRP ($174 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 644.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 112.3 vs 15.1 PassMark/$ ($174 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 255W, a 190W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2066 and DDR4.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i9-9990XE.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +25.0% higher average FPS across 37 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅120% more PCIe lanes (44 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-9990XE across 37 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (657 vs 16,199).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.1 vs 112.3 PassMark/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $174 MSRP).
- ❌292.3% higher power demand at 255W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2066 with DDR4, while Core i5-12400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-9990XE better than Core i5-12400F?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Core i9-9990XE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 328 FPS |
| medium | 168 FPS | 288 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 238 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 182 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 275 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 220 FPS |
| high | 106 FPS | 178 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 142 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 138 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 92 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Core i9-9990XE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 471 FPS | 634 FPS |
| medium | 397 FPS | 521 FPS |
| high | 341 FPS | 431 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 389 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 407 FPS | 554 FPS |
| medium | 351 FPS | 475 FPS |
| high | 309 FPS | 394 FPS |
| ultra | 265 FPS | 338 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 282 FPS | 328 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 286 FPS |
| high | 229 FPS | 267 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 232 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Core i9-9990XE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 754 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 754 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 683 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 575 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 754 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 639 FPS |
| high | 485 FPS | 546 FPS |
| ultra | 434 FPS | 458 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 558 FPS |
| medium | 389 FPS | 458 FPS |
| high | 337 FPS | 411 FPS |
| ultra | 274 FPS | 342 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Core i9-9990XE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 754 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 754 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 754 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 754 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 754 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 754 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 746 FPS |
| ultra | 473 FPS | 656 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 665 FPS |
| medium | 450 FPS | 591 FPS |
| high | 391 FPS | 526 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-12400F and Core i9-9990XE

Core i5-12400F
Core i5-12400F
The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.

Core i9-9990XE
Core i9-9990XE
The Core i9-9990XE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 19.25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 255 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 30,162 points. Launch price was $2,800.
Processing Power
The Core i5-12400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Core i9-9990XE offers 14 cores / 28 threads — the Core i9-9990XE has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F versus 5.1 GHz on the Core i9-9990XE — a 14.7% clock advantage for the Core i9-9990XE (base: 2.5 GHz vs 4 GHz). The Core i5-12400F uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i9-9990XE uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12400F scores 19,532 against the Core i9-9990XE's 30,162 — a 42.8% lead for the Core i9-9990XE. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,700 vs 1,392, a 19.9% lead for the Core i5-12400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 657 vs 16,199 (184.4% advantage for the Core i9-9990XE). L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F vs 19.25 MB (total) on the Core i9-9990XE.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Core i9-9990XE |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 14 / 28+133% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 5.1 GHz+16% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 4 GHz+60% |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total) | 19.25 MB (total)+7% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+25% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-S (2022) | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 19,532 | 30,162+54% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 12,380 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,700+22% | 1,392 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 657 | 16,199+2366% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-12400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i9-9990XE uses LGA2066 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-12400F versus DDR4-2666 on the Core i9-9990XE — the Core i5-12400F supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-12400F) vs 4 (Core i9-9990XE). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-12400F) vs 44 (Core i9-9990XE) — the Core i9-9990XE offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-12400F) and X299 (Core i9-9990XE).
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Core i9-9990XE |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA2066 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+25% | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 44+120% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-9990XE). Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value, Core i9-9990XE targets HEDT. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600; Core i9-9990XE rivals Threadripper 2970WX.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Core i9-9990XE |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Gaming Performance/Value | HEDT |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-12400F launched at $174 MSRP, while the Core i9-9990XE debuted at $2000. On MSRP ($174 vs $2000), the Core i5-12400F is $1826 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-12400F delivers 112.3 pts/$ vs 15.1 pts/$ for the Core i9-9990XE — making the Core i5-12400F the 152.6% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Core i9-9990XE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $174-91% | $2000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 112.3+644% | 15.1 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2019 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












