
Core i5-12400F

Core m3-7Y30
Core i5-12400F vs Core m3-7Y30 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-12400F vs Core m3-7Y30 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-12400F vs Core m3-7Y30: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-12400F
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +282.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+350% larger total L3 cache (18 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Costs $107 less on MSRP ($174 MSRP vs $281 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1204.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 112.3 vs 8.6 PassMark/$ ($174 MSRP vs $281 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA1515 and older memory support.
Trade-offs
- ❌1344.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 4.5W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core m3-7Y30 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core m3-7Y30
2016Why buy it
- ✅Draws 5W instead of 65W, a 61W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 615, while Core i5-12400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (645 vs 12,380).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 18 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.6 vs 112.3 PassMark/$ ($281 MSRP vs $174 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on FCBGA1515, while Core i5-12400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-12400F better than Core m3-7Y30?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-12400F vs Core m3-7Y30 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-12400F
The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.

Core m3-7Y30
The Core m3-7Y30 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,418 points. Launch price was $281.
Processing Power
The Core i5-12400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Core m3-7Y30 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Core i5-12400F has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F versus 2.6 GHz on the Core m3-7Y30 — a 51.4% clock advantage for the Core i5-12400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 1 GHz). The Core i5-12400F uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core m3-7Y30 uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12400F scores 19,532 against the Core m3-7Y30's 2,418 — a 155.9% lead for the Core i5-12400F. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 12,380 vs 645 (180.2% advantage for the Core i5-12400F). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,700 vs 768, a 75.5% lead for the Core i5-12400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 657 vs 1,481 (77.1% advantage for the Core m3-7Y30). L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F vs 4 MB on the Core m3-7Y30.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Core m3-7Y30 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12+200% | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+69% | 2.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz+150% | 1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total)+350% | 4 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+150% | 512 kB |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-S (2022) | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) |
| PassMark | 19,532+708% | 2,418 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 12,380+1819% | 645 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,700+121% | 768 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 657 | 1,481+125% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-12400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core m3-7Y30 uses FCBGA1515 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-12400F versus LPDDR3-1866 / DDR3L-1600 on the Core m3-7Y30 — the Core i5-12400F supports 157.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-12400F supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-12400F) vs 10 (Core m3-7Y30) — the Core i5-12400F offers 10 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-12400F) and Kaby Lake-Y SoC (Core m3-7Y30).
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Core m3-7Y30 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FCBGA1515 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+157% | LPDDR3-1866 / DDR3L-1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+700% | 16 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 20+100% | 10 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F) vs VT-x / VT-d / EPT (Core m3-7Y30). The Core m3-7Y30 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 615), while the Core i5-12400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value, Core m3-7Y30 targets Ultra-portable. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Core m3-7Y30 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel HD Graphics 615 |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | VT-x / VT-d / EPT |
| Target Use | Gaming Performance/Value | Ultra-portable |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-12400F was priced at $174, while the Core m3-7Y30 came in at $281. On launch pricing ($174 vs $281), Core i5-12400F was $107 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-12400F delivers 112.3 pts/$ vs 8.6 pts/$ for the Core m3-7Y30 — making the Core i5-12400F the 171.5% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Core m3-7Y30 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $174-38% | $281 |
| Performance per Dollar | 112.3+1206% | 8.6 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2016 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














