Core i5-12400F vs Core Ultra 7 255U

Intel

Core i5-12400F

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2022

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Core Ultra 7 255U

12 Cores14 Thrd14 WWMax: 5.2 GHz2025

Popular choices:

i5-12400F

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-12400F

2022

Why buy it

  • +9.5% higher PassMark.
  • +50% larger total L3 cache (18 MB vs 12 MB).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core Ultra 7 255U.

Trade-offs

  • Launch MSRP is still $174 MSRP, while Core Ultra 7 255U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 364.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 14W.

Core Ultra 7 255U

2025

Why buy it

  • Draws 14W instead of 65W, a 51W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (17,834 vs 19,532).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 18 MB).
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core Ultra 7 255U better than Core i5-12400F?
It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Core Ultra 7 255U is ahead with a 0.6% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-12400F pulls ahead with 9.5% better PassMark. Core i5-12400F also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (18 MB vs 12 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-12400F is the better fit. You are getting 9.5% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (18 MB vs 12 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core Ultra 7 255U is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-12400F makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Core Ultra 7 255U is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $174 MSRP, and it gives you a 0.6% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that Core i5-12400F is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 9.5% better PassMark. Core i5-12400F is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (112.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core Ultra 7 255U is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2022). That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore i5-12400FCore Ultra 7 255U
1080p
low183 FPS292 FPS
medium168 FPS256 FPS
high139 FPS216 FPS
ultra119 FPS187 FPS
1440p
low153 FPS243 FPS
medium132 FPS192 FPS
high106 FPS157 FPS
ultra89 FPS138 FPS
4K
low87 FPS168 FPS
medium81 FPS134 FPS
high64 FPS104 FPS
ultra49 FPS90 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore i5-12400FCore Ultra 7 255U
1080p
low471 FPS446 FPS
medium397 FPS399 FPS
high341 FPS348 FPS
ultra301 FPS308 FPS
1440p
low407 FPS440 FPS
medium351 FPS367 FPS
high309 FPS322 FPS
ultra265 FPS276 FPS
4K
low282 FPS328 FPS
medium248 FPS285 FPS
high229 FPS265 FPS
ultra196 FPS228 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore i5-12400FCore Ultra 7 255U
1080p
low488 FPS446 FPS
medium488 FPS446 FPS
high488 FPS446 FPS
ultra488 FPS446 FPS
1440p
low488 FPS446 FPS
medium488 FPS446 FPS
high485 FPS446 FPS
ultra434 FPS446 FPS
4K
low442 FPS446 FPS
medium389 FPS446 FPS
high337 FPS446 FPS
ultra274 FPS379 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore i5-12400FCore Ultra 7 255U
1080p
low488 FPS446 FPS
medium488 FPS446 FPS
high488 FPS446 FPS
ultra488 FPS446 FPS
1440p
low488 FPS446 FPS
medium488 FPS446 FPS
high488 FPS446 FPS
ultra473 FPS446 FPS
4K
low488 FPS446 FPS
medium450 FPS446 FPS
high391 FPS446 FPS
ultra330 FPS427 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-12400F and Core Ultra 7 255U

Intel

Core i5-12400F

The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.

Intel

Core Ultra 7 255U

The Core Ultra 7 255U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-U (2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): 14 MB + 12 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 17,834 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The Core i5-12400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Core Ultra 7 255U offers 12 cores / 14 threads — the Core Ultra 7 255U has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F versus 5.2 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 255U — a 16.7% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 255U (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core i5-12400F uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core Ultra 7 255U uses Arrow Lake-U (2025) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12400F scores 19,532 against the Core Ultra 7 255U's 17,834 — a 9.1% lead for the Core i5-12400F. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F vs 12 MB on the Core Ultra 7 255U.

FeatureCore i5-12400FCore Ultra 7 255U
Cores / Threads
6 / 12
12 / 14+100%
Boost Clock
4.4 GHz
5.2 GHz+18%
Base Clock
2.5 GHz
3.8 GHz+52%
L3 Cache
18 MB (total)+50%
12 MB
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)
Process
Intel 7 nm
5 nm-29%
Architecture
Alder Lake-S (2022)
Arrow Lake-U (2025)
PassMark
19,532+10%
17,834
Cinebench R23 Multi
12,380
Geekbench 6 Single
1,700
Geekbench 6 Multi
657
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-12400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core Ultra 7 255U uses FCBGA2049 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i5-12400FCore Ultra 7 255U
Socket
LGA1700
FCBGA2049
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F) / not specified (Core Ultra 7 255U). Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600.

FeatureCore i5-12400FCore Ultra 7 255U
Integrated GPU
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Gaming Performance/Value