
Core i5-12400F

Core Ultra 9 285T
Core i5-12400F vs Core Ultra 9 285T Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-12400F vs Core Ultra 9 285T FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-12400F vs Core Ultra 9 285T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-12400F
2022Why buy it
- β Costs $375 less on MSRP ($174 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- β Delivers 66.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 112.3 vs 67.2 PassMark/$ ($174 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- β Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core Ultra 9 285T.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 9 285T across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (19,532 vs 36,916).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 36 MB).
- β85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
- βNo integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 9 285T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core Ultra 9 285T
2025Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +28.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β +100% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 18 MB).
- β Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Arc Xe-LPG Graphics, while Core i5-12400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 67.2 vs 112.3 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $174 MSRP).
- βNo boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core Ultra 9 285T better than Core i5-12400F?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-12400F vs Core Ultra 9 285T Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-12400F
The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.

Core Ultra 9 285T
The Core Ultra 9 285T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024β2025) architecture. It features 24 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 36,916 points. Launch price was $549.
Processing Power
The Core i5-12400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Core Ultra 9 285T offers 24 cores / 24 threads β the Core Ultra 9 285T has 18 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F versus 5.4 GHz on the Core Ultra 9 285T β a 20.4% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 9 285T (base: 2.5 GHz vs 1.4 GHz). The Core i5-12400F uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core Ultra 9 285T uses Arrow Lake-S (2024β2025) (3 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12400F scores 19,532 against the Core Ultra 9 285T's 36,916 β a 61.6% lead for the Core Ultra 9 285T. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F vs 36 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 9 285T.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Core Ultra 9 285T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 24 / 24+300% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 5.4 GHz+23% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz+79% | 1.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total) | 36 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 3 MB (per core)+140% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 3 nm-57% |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-S (2022) | Arrow Lake-S (2024β2025) |
| PassMark | 19,532 | 36,916+89% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 12,380 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,700 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 657 | β |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-12400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core Ultra 9 285T uses LGA1851 (PCIe 5.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-12400F versus 6400 on the Core Ultra 9 285T β the Core Ultra 9 285T supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core Ultra 9 285T supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB β 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-12400F) and Z890,B860 (Core Ultra 9 285T).
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Core Ultra 9 285T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA1851 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | 6400+33% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 256 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 9 285T). The Core Ultra 9 285T includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc Xe-LPG Graphics), while the Core i5-12400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600; Core Ultra 9 285T rivals Ryzen 9 7900.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Core Ultra 9 285T |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | β | Intel Arc Xe-LPG Graphics |
| Unlocked | β | No |
| AVX-512 | β | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Gaming Performance/Value | β |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-12400F was priced at $174, while the Core Ultra 9 285T came in at $549. On launch pricing ($174 vs $549), Core i5-12400F was $375 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-12400F delivers 112.3 pts/$ vs 67.2 pts/$ for the Core Ultra 9 285T β making the Core i5-12400F the 50.2% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Core Ultra 9 285T |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $174-68% | $549 |
| Performance per Dollar | 112.3+67% | 67.2 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2025 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














