
Core i5-12400F

EPYC 4585PX
Core i5-12400F vs EPYC 4585PX Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-12400F vs EPYC 4585PX FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-12400F vs EPYC 4585PX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-12400F
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $525 less on MSRP ($174 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 11.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 112.3 vs 100.9 PassMark/$ ($174 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 170W, a 105W reduction.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike EPYC 4585PX.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4585PX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,532 vs 70,563).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 4585PX, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 28 PCIe lanes.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4585PX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
EPYC 4585PX
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +35.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 28 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics, while Core i5-12400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 100.9 vs 112.3 PassMark/$ ($699 MSRP vs $174 MSRP).
- ❌161.5% higher power demand at 170W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 4585PX better than Core i5-12400F?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-12400F vs EPYC 4585PX Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-12400F
The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.

EPYC 4585PX
The EPYC 4585PX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 May 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Grado (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 70,563 points. Launch price was $699.
Processing Power
The Core i5-12400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the EPYC 4585PX offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the EPYC 4585PX has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F versus 5.7 GHz on the EPYC 4585PX — a 25.7% clock advantage for the EPYC 4585PX (base: 2.5 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The Core i5-12400F uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the EPYC 4585PX uses Grado (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12400F scores 19,532 against the EPYC 4585PX's 70,563 — a 113.3% lead for the EPYC 4585PX. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F vs 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 4585PX.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | EPYC 4585PX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 16 / 32+167% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 5.7 GHz+30% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 4.3 GHz+72% |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total) | 128 MB (total)+611% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+25% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-S (2022) | Grado (2025) |
| PassMark | 19,532 | 70,563+261% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 12,380 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,700 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 657 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-12400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the EPYC 4585PX uses AM5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-12400F versus 5600 on the EPYC 4585PX — the EPYC 4585PX supports 16.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 4585PX supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-12400F) vs 28 (EPYC 4585PX) — the EPYC 4585PX offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-12400F) and AM5 (EPYC 4585PX).
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | EPYC 4585PX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | 5600+17% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 256 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 28+40% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 4585PX). The EPYC 4585PX includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics), while the Core i5-12400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600; EPYC 4585PX rivals Core Ultra 9 285K.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | EPYC 4585PX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | AMD Radeon Graphics |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V |
| Target Use | Gaming Performance/Value | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-12400F was priced at $174, while the EPYC 4585PX came in at $699. On launch pricing ($174 vs $699), Core i5-12400F was $525 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-12400F delivers 112.3 pts/$ vs 100.9 pts/$ for the EPYC 4585PX — making the Core i5-12400F the 10.6% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | EPYC 4585PX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $174-75% | $699 |
| Performance per Dollar | 112.3+11% | 100.9 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2025 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















