Core i5-12400F
EPYC 7713P
Core i5-12400F vs EPYC 7713P Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-12400F vs EPYC 7713P FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-12400F vs EPYC 7713P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-12400F
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $4,836 less on MSRP ($174 MSRP vs $5,010 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 589.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 112.3 vs 16.3 PassMark/$ ($174 MSRP vs $5,010 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 225W, a 160W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike EPYC 7713P.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,532 vs 81,582).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 256 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7713P, which brings 64 cores / 128 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
EPYC 7713P
2021Why buy it
- ✅+317.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅+1322.2% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 18 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 64 cores / 128 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- ✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 16.3 vs 112.3 PassMark/$ ($5,010 MSRP vs $174 MSRP).
- ❌246.2% higher power demand at 225W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Core i5-12400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-12400F better than EPYC 7713P?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-12400F vs EPYC 7713P Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Core i5-12400F
The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.
EPYC 7713P
The EPYC 7713P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.68 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 81,582 points. Launch price was $5,010.
Processing Power
The Core i5-12400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the EPYC 7713P offers 64 cores / 128 threads — the EPYC 7713P has 58 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F versus 3.68 GHz on the EPYC 7713P — a 17.8% clock advantage for the Core i5-12400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i5-12400F uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the EPYC 7713P uses Milan (2021−2023) (7 nm+). In PassMark, the Core i5-12400F scores 19,532 against the EPYC 7713P's 81,582 — a 122.7% lead for the EPYC 7713P. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F vs 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 7713P.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | EPYC 7713P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 64 / 128+967% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+20% | 3.68 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz+25% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total) | 256 MB (total)+1322% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+150% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 7 nm+ |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-S (2022) | Milan (2021−2023) |
| PassMark | 19,532 | 81,582+318% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 12,380 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,700 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 657 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-12400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the EPYC 7713P uses SP3 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-12400F versus 3200 on the EPYC 7713P — the Core i5-12400F supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7713P supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 3100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-12400F) vs 8 (EPYC 7713P). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-12400F) vs 128 (EPYC 7713P) — the EPYC 7713P offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-12400F) and SP3 (EPYC 7713P).
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | EPYC 7713P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | SP3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+50% | 3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 4096 GB+3100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 128+540% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F) vs VT-x, VT-d, SEV (EPYC 7713P). Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600; EPYC 7713P rivals Xeon Platinum 8380.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | EPYC 7713P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | VT-x, VT-d, SEV |
| Target Use | Gaming Performance/Value | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-12400F was priced at $174, while the EPYC 7713P came in at $5010. On launch pricing ($174 vs $5010), Core i5-12400F was $4836 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-12400F delivers 112.3 pts/$ vs 16.3 pts/$ for the EPYC 7713P — making the Core i5-12400F the 149.3% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | EPYC 7713P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $174-97% | $5010 |
| Performance per Dollar | 112.3+589% | 16.3 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2021 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i5-12400F and EPYC 7713P
