
Core i5-12400F
Popular choices:

EPYC 9354P
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-12400F
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,556 less on MSRP ($174 MSRP vs $2,730 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 309.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 112.3 vs 27.4 PassMark/$ ($174 MSRP vs $2,730 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 280W, a 215W reduction.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike EPYC 9354P.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9354P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,532 vs 74,808).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9354P, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
EPYC 9354P
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +15.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- ✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 27.4 vs 112.3 PassMark/$ ($2,730 MSRP vs $174 MSRP).
- ❌330.8% higher power demand at 280W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Core i5-12400F
2022EPYC 9354P
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,556 less on MSRP ($174 MSRP vs $2,730 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 309.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 112.3 vs 27.4 PassMark/$ ($174 MSRP vs $2,730 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 280W, a 215W reduction.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike EPYC 9354P.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +15.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- ✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9354P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,532 vs 74,808).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9354P, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 27.4 vs 112.3 PassMark/$ ($2,730 MSRP vs $174 MSRP).
- ❌330.8% higher power demand at 280W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 9354P better than Core i5-12400F?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | EPYC 9354P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 168 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 96 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 153 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 106 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 39 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | EPYC 9354P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 471 FPS | 534 FPS |
| medium | 397 FPS | 466 FPS |
| high | 341 FPS | 374 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 304 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 407 FPS | 439 FPS |
| medium | 351 FPS | 392 FPS |
| high | 309 FPS | 324 FPS |
| ultra | 265 FPS | 255 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 282 FPS | 270 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 246 FPS |
| high | 229 FPS | 216 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 179 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | EPYC 9354P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 673 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 562 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 523 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 455 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 511 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 426 FPS |
| high | 485 FPS | 390 FPS |
| ultra | 434 FPS | 337 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 377 FPS |
| medium | 389 FPS | 295 FPS |
| high | 337 FPS | 263 FPS |
| ultra | 274 FPS | 211 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | EPYC 9354P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 937 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 856 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 735 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 648 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 751 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 658 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 561 FPS |
| ultra | 473 FPS | 480 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 539 FPS |
| medium | 450 FPS | 484 FPS |
| high | 391 FPS | 423 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 366 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-12400F and EPYC 9354P

Core i5-12400F
Core i5-12400F
The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.

EPYC 9354P
EPYC 9354P
The EPYC 9354P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.25 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 74,808 points. Launch price was $2,730.
Processing Power
The Core i5-12400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the EPYC 9354P offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the EPYC 9354P has 26 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F versus 3.8 GHz on the EPYC 9354P — a 14.6% clock advantage for the Core i5-12400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.25 GHz). The Core i5-12400F uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the EPYC 9354P uses Genoa (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12400F scores 19,532 against the EPYC 9354P's 74,808 — a 117.2% lead for the EPYC 9354P. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F vs 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9354P.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | EPYC 9354P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 32 / 64+433% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+16% | 3.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.25 GHz+30% |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total) | 256 MB (total)+1322% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+25% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 5 nm, 6 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-S (2022) | Genoa (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 19,532 | 74,808+283% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 12,380 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,700 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 657 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-12400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the EPYC 9354P uses SP5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-12400F versus 4800 on the EPYC 9354P — the EPYC 9354P supports 199.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9354P supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 128 GB — 191.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-12400F) vs 12 (EPYC 9354P). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-12400F) vs 128 (EPYC 9354P) — the EPYC 9354P offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-12400F) and SP5 (EPYC 9354P).
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | EPYC 9354P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | SP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | 4800+95900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+2184433% | 6144 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 12+500% |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 128+540% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F) vs VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9354P). Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600; EPYC 9354P rivals Xeon Platinum 8468.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | EPYC 9354P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP |
| Target Use | Gaming Performance/Value | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-12400F launched at $174 MSRP, while the EPYC 9354P debuted at $2730. On MSRP ($174 vs $2730), the Core i5-12400F is $2556 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-12400F delivers 112.3 pts/$ vs 27.4 pts/$ for the EPYC 9354P — making the Core i5-12400F the 121.5% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | EPYC 9354P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $174-94% | $2730 |
| Performance per Dollar | 112.3+310% | 27.4 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












