
Core i5-12400F
Popular choices:

EPYC 9355P
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-12400F
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,824 less on MSRP ($174 MSRP vs $2,998 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 246.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 112.3 vs 32.4 PassMark/$ ($174 MSRP vs $2,998 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 280W, a 215W reduction.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike EPYC 9355P.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9355P across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,532 vs 97,249).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9355P, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
EPYC 9355P
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +23.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- ✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 32.4 vs 112.3 PassMark/$ ($2,998 MSRP vs $174 MSRP).
- ❌330.8% higher power demand at 280W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Core i5-12400F
2022EPYC 9355P
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,824 less on MSRP ($174 MSRP vs $2,998 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 246.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 112.3 vs 32.4 PassMark/$ ($174 MSRP vs $2,998 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 280W, a 215W reduction.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike EPYC 9355P.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +23.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- ✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9355P across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,532 vs 97,249).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9355P, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 32.4 vs 112.3 PassMark/$ ($2,998 MSRP vs $174 MSRP).
- ❌330.8% higher power demand at 280W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 9355P better than Core i5-12400F?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | EPYC 9355P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 174 FPS |
| medium | 168 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 124 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 101 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 152 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 106 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 84 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 48 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | EPYC 9355P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 471 FPS | 658 FPS |
| medium | 397 FPS | 566 FPS |
| high | 341 FPS | 459 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 397 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 407 FPS | 548 FPS |
| medium | 351 FPS | 483 FPS |
| high | 309 FPS | 404 FPS |
| ultra | 265 FPS | 328 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 282 FPS | 333 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 295 FPS |
| high | 229 FPS | 268 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 236 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | EPYC 9355P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 752 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 638 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 593 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 521 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 474 FPS |
| high | 485 FPS | 434 FPS |
| ultra | 434 FPS | 376 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 405 FPS |
| medium | 389 FPS | 326 FPS |
| high | 337 FPS | 288 FPS |
| ultra | 274 FPS | 229 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | EPYC 9355P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 1018 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 914 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 788 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 711 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 813 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 707 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 606 FPS |
| ultra | 473 FPS | 535 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 577 FPS |
| medium | 450 FPS | 512 FPS |
| high | 391 FPS | 449 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 394 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-12400F and EPYC 9355P

Core i5-12400F
Core i5-12400F
The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.

EPYC 9355P
EPYC 9355P
The EPYC 9355P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.55 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 97,249 points. Launch price was $2,998.
Processing Power
The Core i5-12400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the EPYC 9355P offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the EPYC 9355P has 26 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F versus 4.4 GHz on the EPYC 9355P — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.55 GHz). The Core i5-12400F uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the EPYC 9355P uses Turin (2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12400F scores 19,532 against the EPYC 9355P's 97,249 — a 133.1% lead for the EPYC 9355P. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F vs 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9355P.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | EPYC 9355P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 32 / 64+433% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 4.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.55 GHz+42% |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total) | 256 MB (total)+1322% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+25% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-S (2022) | Turin (2024) |
| PassMark | 19,532 | 97,249+398% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 12,380 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,700 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 657 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-12400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the EPYC 9355P uses SP5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Core i5-12400F supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 6 TB — 182.1% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-12400F) vs 12 (EPYC 9355P). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-12400F) vs 128 (EPYC 9355P) — the EPYC 9355P offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-12400F) and SP5 (EPYC 9355P).
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | EPYC 9355P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | SP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | DDR5-6000 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 6 TB+4700% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 12+500% |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 128+540% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F) vs AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9355P). Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value, EPYC 9355P targets Data Center / Single Socket. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600; EPYC 9355P rivals Xeon 6740P.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | EPYC 9355P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | AMD-V, SEV-SNP |
| Target Use | Gaming Performance/Value | Data Center / Single Socket |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-12400F launched at $174 MSRP, while the EPYC 9355P debuted at $2998. On MSRP ($174 vs $2998), the Core i5-12400F is $2824 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-12400F delivers 112.3 pts/$ vs 32.4 pts/$ for the EPYC 9355P — making the Core i5-12400F the 110.3% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | EPYC 9355P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $174-94% | $2998 |
| Performance per Dollar | 112.3+247% | 32.4 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












