Core i5-12400F vs FX-4350

Intel

Core i5-12400F

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2022
Core family
·······
VS
AMD

FX-4350

4 Cores4 Thrd125 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2013
Similar parts
·······

Core i5-12400F vs FX-4350 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-12400F vs FX-4350 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-12400F vs FX-4350: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-12400F

2022

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +178.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Delivers 330.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 112.3 vs 26.1 PassMark/$ ($174 MSRP vs $122 MSRP).
  • Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
  • Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM3+ and older memory support.
  • 25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Lower Geekbench multi-core (657 vs 1,289).
  • 42.6% HIGHER MSRP
    $174 MSRPvs$122 MSRP

FX-4350

2013

Why buy it

  • +96.2% higher Geekbench multi-core.
  • Costs $52 less on MSRP ($122 MSRP vs $174 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 26.1 vs 112.3 PassMark/$ ($122 MSRP vs $174 MSRP).
  • 92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
  • Older platform position on AM3+, while Core i5-12400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-12400F better than FX-4350?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i5-12400F is ahead with a 178.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, FX-4350 pulls ahead with 96.2% better Geekbench multi-core.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, FX-4350 is the stronger fit. You are getting 96.2% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i5-12400F is the better buy right now. Core i5-12400F comes in 42.6% more expensive on MSRP at $174 MSRP versus $122 MSRP, and it still gives you a 178.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that FX-4350 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 96.2% better Geekbench multi-core. It is also 330.1% better value on MSRP (112.3 vs 26.1 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-12400F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2013) and a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of AM3+. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i5-12400F vs FX-4350 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i5-12400F

The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.

AMD

FX-4350

The FX-4350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 April 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,184 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Core i5-12400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the FX-4350 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Core i5-12400F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F versus 4.3 GHz on the FX-4350 — a 2.3% clock advantage for the Core i5-12400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 4.2 GHz). The Core i5-12400F uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the FX-4350 uses Vishera (2012−2015) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12400F scores 19,532 against the FX-4350's 3,184 — a 143.9% lead for the Core i5-12400F. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,700 vs 504, a 108.5% lead for the Core i5-12400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 657 vs 1,289 (65% advantage for the FX-4350).

FeatureCore i5-12400FFX-4350
Cores / Threads
6 / 12+50%
4 / 4
Boost Clock
4.4 GHz+2%
4.3 GHz
Base Clock
2.5 GHz
4.2 GHz+68%
L3 Cache
18 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)
4096 kB+220%
Process
Intel 7 nm-78%
32 nm
Architecture
Alder Lake-S (2022)
Vishera (2012−2015)
PassMark
19,532+513%
3,184
Cinebench R23 Multi
12,380
Geekbench 6 Single
1,700+237%
504
Geekbench 6 Multi
657
1,289+96%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-12400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the FX-4350 uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-12400F versus DDR3-1866 on the FX-4350 — the Core i5-12400F supports 157.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-12400F supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-12400F) vs 16 (FX-4350) — the Core i5-12400F offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-12400F) and AMD 970,990X,990FX (FX-4350).

FeatureCore i5-12400FFX-4350
Socket
LGA1700
AM3+
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+157%
DDR3-1866
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB+300%
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
No
Yes
PCIe Lanes
20+25%
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F) vs AMD-V (FX-4350). Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value, FX-4350 targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600.

FeatureCore i5-12400FFX-4350
Integrated GPU
No
No
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
AMD-V
Target Use
Gaming Performance/Value
Gaming
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-12400F was priced at $174, while the FX-4350 came in at $122. On launch pricing ($174 vs $122), FX-4350 was $52 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-12400F delivers 112.3 pts/$ vs 26.1 pts/$ for the FX-4350 — making the Core i5-12400F the 124.5% better value option.

FeatureCore i5-12400FFX-4350
MSRP
$174
$122-30%
Performance per Dollar
112.3+330%
26.1
Release Date
2022
2013

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.