
Core i5-12400F
Popular choices:

M3 Pro 11-Core
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-12400F
2022Why buy it
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- β Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike M3 Pro 11-Core.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than M3 Pro 11-Core across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (19,532 vs 24,861).
- βLaunch MSRP is still $174 MSRP, while M3 Pro 11-Core mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
M3 Pro 11-Core
2023Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +12.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- βNo boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Core i5-12400F
2022M3 Pro 11-Core
2023Why buy it
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- β Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike M3 Pro 11-Core.
Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +12.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than M3 Pro 11-Core across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (19,532 vs 24,861).
- βLaunch MSRP is still $174 MSRP, while M3 Pro 11-Core mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- βNo boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Quick Answers
So, is M3 Pro 11-Core better than Core i5-12400F?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | M3 Pro 11-Core |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 168 FPS | 146 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 106 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | M3 Pro 11-Core |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 471 FPS | 399 FPS |
| medium | 397 FPS | 339 FPS |
| high | 341 FPS | 293 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 256 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 407 FPS | 352 FPS |
| medium | 351 FPS | 309 FPS |
| high | 309 FPS | 270 FPS |
| ultra | 265 FPS | 230 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 282 FPS | 255 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 229 FPS |
| high | 229 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 184 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | M3 Pro 11-Core |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 622 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 622 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 622 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 593 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 622 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 515 FPS |
| high | 485 FPS | 458 FPS |
| ultra | 434 FPS | 400 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 452 FPS |
| medium | 389 FPS | 356 FPS |
| high | 337 FPS | 310 FPS |
| ultra | 274 FPS | 248 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | M3 Pro 11-Core |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 622 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 622 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 622 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 621 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 622 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 622 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 540 FPS |
| ultra | 473 FPS | 469 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 494 FPS |
| medium | 450 FPS | 443 FPS |
| high | 391 FPS | 396 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 342 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-12400F and M3 Pro 11-Core

Core i5-12400F
Core i5-12400F
The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.
M3 Pro 11-Core
M3 Pro 11-Core
The M3 Pro 11-Core is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 30 October 2023 (2 years ago). It features 11 cores and 11 threads. Base frequency is 2.748 GHz, with boost up to 4.06 GHz. Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: none. Memory support: LPDDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 24,861 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i5-12400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the M3 Pro 11-Core offers 11 cores / 11 threads β the M3 Pro 11-Core has 5 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F versus 4.06 GHz on the M3 Pro 11-Core β a 8% clock advantage for the Core i5-12400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.748 GHz). The Core i5-12400F is built on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i5-12400F scores 19,532 against the M3 Pro 11-Core's 24,861 β a 24% lead for the M3 Pro 11-Core.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | M3 Pro 11-Core |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 11 / 11+83% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+8% | 4.06 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 2.748 GHz+10% |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total) | β |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | β |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 3 nm-57% |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-S (2022) | β |
| PassMark | 19,532 | 24,861+27% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 12,380 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,700 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 657 | β |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-12400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the M3 Pro 11-Core uses none (PCIe 4.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | M3 Pro 11-Core |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | none |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | β |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | β |
| RAM Channels | 2 | β |
| ECC Support | No | β |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | β |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F) / not specified (M3 Pro 11-Core). Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | M3 Pro 11-Core |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | β |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | β |
| Target Use | Gaming Performance/Value | β |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












