
Core i5-12400F

Microsoft SQ1
Core i5-12400F vs Microsoft SQ1 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-12400F vs Microsoft SQ1 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-12400F vs Microsoft SQ1: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-12400F
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +77.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+800% larger total L3 cache (18 MB vs 2 MB).
- ✅Costs $126 less on MSRP ($174 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 457.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 112.3 vs 20.1 PassMark/$ ($174 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Microsoft SQ1
2019Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (6,039 vs 19,532).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 18 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 20.1 vs 112.3 PassMark/$ ($300 MSRP vs $174 MSRP).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-12400F better than Microsoft SQ1?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-12400F vs Microsoft SQ1 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-12400F
The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.
Microsoft SQ1
The Microsoft SQ1 is manufactured by Microsoft. It was released in 2 October 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 495) (2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Max frequency: 3 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. Built on 7 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): + 2 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 6,039 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core i5-12400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Microsoft SQ1 offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the Microsoft SQ1 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F versus 3 GHz on the Microsoft SQ1 — a 37.8% clock advantage for the Core i5-12400F. The Core i5-12400F uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Microsoft SQ1 uses Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 495) (2019) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12400F scores 19,532 against the Microsoft SQ1's 6,039 — a 105.5% lead for the Core i5-12400F. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F vs 2 MB on the Microsoft SQ1.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Microsoft SQ1 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 8+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+47% | 3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total)+800% | 2 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | — |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-S (2022) | Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 495) (2019) |
| PassMark | 19,532+223% | 6,039 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 12,380 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,700 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 657 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F) / not specified (Microsoft SQ1). Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Microsoft SQ1 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Gaming Performance/Value | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-12400F was priced at $174, while the Microsoft SQ1 came in at $300. On launch pricing ($174 vs $300), Core i5-12400F was $126 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-12400F delivers 112.3 pts/$ vs 20.1 pts/$ for the Microsoft SQ1 — making the Core i5-12400F the 139.2% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Microsoft SQ1 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $174-42% | $300 |
| Performance per Dollar | 112.3+459% | 20.1 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2019 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














