
Core i5-12400F
Popular choices:

Phenom II X3 P840
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-12400F
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +330.0% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of S1 and older memory support.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Phenom II X3 P840.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $174 MSRP, while Phenom II X3 P840 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌4233.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 1.5W.
Phenom II X3 P840
2010Why buy it
- ✅Draws 2W instead of 65W, a 64W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12400F across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (4,425 vs 19,532).
- ❌Older platform position on S1, while Core i5-12400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Core i5-12400F
2022Phenom II X3 P840
2010Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +330.0% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of S1 and older memory support.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Phenom II X3 P840.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 2W instead of 65W, a 64W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $174 MSRP, while Phenom II X3 P840 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌4233.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 1.5W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12400F across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (4,425 vs 19,532).
- ❌Older platform position on S1, while Core i5-12400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-12400F better than Phenom II X3 P840?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Phenom II X3 P840 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 111 FPS |
| medium | 168 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 111 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 102 FPS |
| high | 106 FPS | 79 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 61 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 52 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 31 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Phenom II X3 P840 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 471 FPS | 111 FPS |
| medium | 397 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 341 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 407 FPS | 111 FPS |
| medium | 351 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 309 FPS | 87 FPS |
| ultra | 265 FPS | 66 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 282 FPS | 76 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 66 FPS |
| high | 229 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 32 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Phenom II X3 P840 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 111 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 111 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 485 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 434 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 111 FPS |
| medium | 389 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 337 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 274 FPS | 111 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Phenom II X3 P840 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 111 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 111 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 473 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 111 FPS |
| medium | 450 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 391 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 111 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-12400F and Phenom II X3 P840

Core i5-12400F
Core i5-12400F
The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.

Phenom II X3 P840
Phenom II X3 P840
The Phenom II X3 P840 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Champlain (2010−2011) architecture. It features 3 cores and 3 threads. Max frequency: 1.9 GHz. L2 cache: 1.5 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1.5 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,425 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core i5-12400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Phenom II X3 P840 offers 3 cores / 3 threads — the Core i5-12400F has 3 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F versus 1.9 GHz on the Phenom II X3 P840 — a 79.4% clock advantage for the Core i5-12400F. The Core i5-12400F uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Phenom II X3 P840 uses Champlain (2010−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12400F scores 19,532 against the Phenom II X3 P840's 4,425 — a 126.1% lead for the Core i5-12400F.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Phenom II X3 P840 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12+100% | 3 / 3 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+132% | 1.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total) | — |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 1.5 MB+20% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-84% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-S (2022) | Champlain (2010−2011) |
| PassMark | 19,532+341% | 4,425 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 12,380 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,700 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 657 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-12400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Phenom II X3 P840 uses S1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Phenom II X3 P840 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | S1 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F) / not specified (Phenom II X3 P840). Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Phenom II X3 P840 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Gaming Performance/Value | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












