
Core i5-12400F
Popular choices:

PRO A10-8850B
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-12400F
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +352.8% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 95W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of FM2+ and older memory support.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike PRO A10-8850B.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $174 MSRP, while PRO A10-8850B mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
PRO A10-8850B
2015Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12400F across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (3,752 vs 19,532).
- ❌46.2% higher power demand at 95W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on FM2+, while Core i5-12400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Core i5-12400F
2022PRO A10-8850B
2015Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +352.8% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 95W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of FM2+ and older memory support.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike PRO A10-8850B.
Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $174 MSRP, while PRO A10-8850B mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12400F across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (3,752 vs 19,532).
- ❌46.2% higher power demand at 95W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on FM2+, while Core i5-12400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-12400F better than PRO A10-8850B?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | PRO A10-8850B |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 94 FPS |
| medium | 168 FPS | 94 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 94 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 94 FPS |
| high | 106 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | PRO A10-8850B |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 471 FPS | 94 FPS |
| medium | 397 FPS | 94 FPS |
| high | 341 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 407 FPS | 94 FPS |
| medium | 351 FPS | 94 FPS |
| high | 309 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 265 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 282 FPS | 94 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 94 FPS |
| high | 229 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 94 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | PRO A10-8850B |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 94 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 94 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 94 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 94 FPS |
| high | 485 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 434 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 94 FPS |
| medium | 389 FPS | 94 FPS |
| high | 337 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 274 FPS | 94 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | PRO A10-8850B |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 94 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 94 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 94 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 94 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 473 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 94 FPS |
| medium | 450 FPS | 94 FPS |
| high | 391 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 94 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-12400F and PRO A10-8850B

Core i5-12400F
Core i5-12400F
The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.

PRO A10-8850B
PRO A10-8850B
The PRO A10-8850B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Godaveri (2014−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,752 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Core i5-12400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the PRO A10-8850B offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Core i5-12400F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F versus 4.1 GHz on the PRO A10-8850B — a 7.1% clock advantage for the Core i5-12400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.9 GHz). The Core i5-12400F uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the PRO A10-8850B uses Godaveri (2014−2016) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12400F scores 19,532 against the PRO A10-8850B's 3,752 — a 135.5% lead for the Core i5-12400F.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | PRO A10-8850B |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12+50% | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+7% | 4.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.9 GHz+56% |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total) | — |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 4096 kB+220% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-75% | 28 nm |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-S (2022) | Godaveri (2014−2016) |
| PassMark | 19,532+421% | 3,752 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 12,380 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,700 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 657 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-12400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the PRO A10-8850B uses FM2+ (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | PRO A10-8850B |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FM2+ |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F) / not specified (PRO A10-8850B). Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | PRO A10-8850B |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Gaming Performance/Value | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












