Core i5-12400F vs PRO A12-8870

Intel

Core i5-12400F

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2022

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

PRO A12-8870

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.2 GHz2016

Popular choices:

i5-12400F

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-12400F

2022

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +269.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike PRO A12-8870.

Trade-offs

  • Launch MSRP is still $174 MSRP, while PRO A12-8870 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

PRO A12-8870

2016

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12400F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
    • Lower PassMark (3,805 vs 19,532).
    • Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i5-12400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
    • No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Core i5-12400F better than PRO A12-8870?
    Yes. Core i5-12400F is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 269.3% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data, 413.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Core i5-12400F is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 269.3% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-12400F is the better fit. You are getting 413.3% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Core i5-12400F is the smarter buy today. Core i5-12400F is at an unclear MSRP at $174 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 269.3% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (112.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible AM4 + DDR4 setup, PRO A12-8870 can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Core i5-12400F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2016), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of AM4, and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 4/4. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

    Games Benchmarks

    Paired with RTX 4090

    To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

    Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

    Path of Exile 2

    Path of Exile 2

    PresetCore i5-12400FPRO A12-8870
    1080p
    low183 FPS95 FPS
    medium168 FPS95 FPS
    high139 FPS95 FPS
    ultra119 FPS93 FPS
    1440p
    low153 FPS95 FPS
    medium132 FPS95 FPS
    high106 FPS94 FPS
    ultra89 FPS76 FPS
    4K
    low87 FPS65 FPS
    medium81 FPS58 FPS
    high64 FPS45 FPS
    ultra49 FPS36 FPS
    Counter-Strike 2

    Counter-Strike 2

    PresetCore i5-12400FPRO A12-8870
    1080p
    low471 FPS95 FPS
    medium397 FPS95 FPS
    high341 FPS95 FPS
    ultra301 FPS95 FPS
    1440p
    low407 FPS95 FPS
    medium351 FPS95 FPS
    high309 FPS95 FPS
    ultra265 FPS95 FPS
    4K
    low282 FPS95 FPS
    medium248 FPS95 FPS
    high229 FPS95 FPS
    ultra196 FPS95 FPS
    League of Legends

    League of Legends

    PresetCore i5-12400FPRO A12-8870
    1080p
    low488 FPS95 FPS
    medium488 FPS95 FPS
    high488 FPS95 FPS
    ultra488 FPS95 FPS
    1440p
    low488 FPS95 FPS
    medium488 FPS95 FPS
    high485 FPS95 FPS
    ultra434 FPS95 FPS
    4K
    low442 FPS95 FPS
    medium389 FPS95 FPS
    high337 FPS95 FPS
    ultra274 FPS95 FPS
    Valorant

    Valorant

    PresetCore i5-12400FPRO A12-8870
    1080p
    low488 FPS95 FPS
    medium488 FPS95 FPS
    high488 FPS95 FPS
    ultra488 FPS95 FPS
    1440p
    low488 FPS95 FPS
    medium488 FPS95 FPS
    high488 FPS95 FPS
    ultra473 FPS95 FPS
    4K
    low488 FPS95 FPS
    medium450 FPS95 FPS
    high391 FPS95 FPS
    ultra330 FPS95 FPS

    Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-12400F and PRO A12-8870

    Intel

    Core i5-12400F

    The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.

    AMD

    PRO A12-8870

    The PRO A12-8870 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Outubro 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,805 points. Launch price was $69.

    Processing Power

    The Core i5-12400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the PRO A12-8870 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Core i5-12400F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F versus 4.2 GHz on the PRO A12-8870 — a 4.7% clock advantage for the Core i5-12400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Core i5-12400F uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the PRO A12-8870 uses Carrizo (2015−2018) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12400F scores 19,532 against the PRO A12-8870's 3,805 — a 134.8% lead for the Core i5-12400F.

    FeatureCore i5-12400FPRO A12-8870
    Cores / Threads
    6 / 12+50%
    4 / 4
    Boost Clock
    4.4 GHz+5%
    4.2 GHz
    Base Clock
    2.5 GHz
    3.7 GHz+48%
    L3 Cache
    18 MB (total)
    L2 Cache
    1.25 MB (per core)
    2048 kB+60%
    Process
    Intel 7 nm-75%
    28 nm
    Architecture
    Alder Lake-S (2022)
    Carrizo (2015−2018)
    PassMark
    19,532+413%
    3,805
    Cinebench R23 Multi
    12,380
    Geekbench 6 Single
    1,700
    Geekbench 6 Multi
    657
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Core i5-12400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the PRO A12-8870 uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeatureCore i5-12400FPRO A12-8870
    Socket
    LGA1700
    AM4
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 3.0
    PCIe 3.0
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
    Max RAM Capacity
    128 GB
    RAM Channels
    2
    ECC Support
    No
    PCIe Lanes
    20
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F) / not specified (PRO A12-8870). Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600.

    FeatureCore i5-12400FPRO A12-8870
    Integrated GPU
    No
    Virtualization
    VT-x, VT-d, EPT
    Target Use
    Gaming Performance/Value