Core i5-12400F vs Processor 300T

Intel

Core i5-12400F

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2022
Core family
·······
VS
Intel

Processor 300T

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2024
Similar parts
·······

Core i5-12400F vs Processor 300T Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-12400F vs Processor 300T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-12400F vs Processor 300T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-12400F

2022

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +111.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +200% larger total L3 cache (18 MB vs 6 MB).
  • Delivers 51.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 112.3 vs 74.2 PassMark/$ ($174 MSRP vs $82 MSRP).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Processor 300T.

Trade-offs

  • 112.2% HIGHER MSRP
    $174 MSRPvs$82 MSRP
  • 85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.

Processor 300T

2024

Why buy it

  • Costs $92 less on MSRP ($82 MSRP vs $174 MSRP).
  • Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (6,084 vs 19,532).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 18 MB).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 74.2 vs 112.3 PassMark/$ ($82 MSRP vs $174 MSRP).
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-12400F better than Processor 300T?
Yes. Core i5-12400F is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 111.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 221% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i5-12400F is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 111.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-12400F is the stronger fit. You are getting 221% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 200% larger total L3 cache (18 MB vs 6 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i5-12400F is the better buy right now. Core i5-12400F comes in 112.2% more expensive on MSRP at $174 MSRP versus $82 MSRP, and it still gives you a 111.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 51.3% better value on MSRP (112.3 vs 74.2 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Processor 300T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2022). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i5-12400F vs Processor 300T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i5-12400F

The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.

Intel

Processor 300T

The Processor 300T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 6,084 points. Launch price was $82.

Processing Power

The Core i5-12400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Processor 300T offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Core i5-12400F has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F versus 3.4 GHz on the Processor 300T — a 25.6% clock advantage for the Core i5-12400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core i5-12400F uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Processor 300T uses Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12400F scores 19,532 against the Processor 300T's 6,084 — a 105% lead for the Core i5-12400F. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F vs 6 MB (total) on the Processor 300T.

FeatureCore i5-12400FProcessor 300T
Cores / Threads
6 / 12+200%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
4.4 GHz+29%
3.4 GHz
Base Clock
2.5 GHz
3.4 GHz+36%
L3 Cache
18 MB (total)+200%
6 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)
1.25 MB (per core)
Process
Intel 7 nm
Intel 7 nm
Architecture
Alder Lake-S (2022)
Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
PassMark
19,532+221%
6,084
Cinebench R23 Multi
12,380
Geekbench 6 Single
1,700
Geekbench 6 Multi
657
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA1700 socket with PCIe 3.0.

FeatureCore i5-12400FProcessor 300T
Socket
LGA1700
LGA1700
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F) / not specified (Processor 300T). Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600.

FeatureCore i5-12400FProcessor 300T
Integrated GPU
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Gaming Performance/Value
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-12400F was priced at $174, while the Processor 300T came in at $82. On launch pricing ($174 vs $82), Processor 300T was $92 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-12400F delivers 112.3 pts/$ vs 74.2 pts/$ for the Processor 300T — making the Core i5-12400F the 40.8% better value option.

FeatureCore i5-12400FProcessor 300T
MSRP
$174
$82-53%
Performance per Dollar
112.3+51%
74.2
Release Date
2022
2024

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.