Core i5-12400F vs Processor N95

Intel

Core i5-12400F

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2022

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Processor N95

4 Cores4 Thrd0 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2023

Popular choices:

i5-12400F

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-12400F

2022

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +257.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +200% larger total L3 cache (18 MB vs 6 MB).
  • Delivers 275.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 112.3 vs 29.9 PassMark/$ ($174 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Processor N95.

Trade-offs

  • 8.8% HIGHER MSRP
    $174 MSRPvs$160 MSRP

Processor N95

2023

Why buy it

  • Costs $14 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $174 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12400F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (4,783 vs 19,532).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 18 MB).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 29.9 vs 112.3 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $174 MSRP).
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-12400F better than Processor N95?
Yes. Core i5-12400F is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 257.9% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data and 308.4% better PassMark, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i5-12400F is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 257.9% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-12400F is the better fit. You are getting 308.4% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 200% larger total L3 cache (18 MB vs 6 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i5-12400F is the smarter buy today. Core i5-12400F is 8.8% more expensive on MSRP at $174 MSRP versus $160 MSRP, and it gives you a 257.9% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 275.5% better value on MSRP (112.3 vs 29.9 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Processor N95 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2022). That makes it the safer long-term pick.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore i5-12400FProcessor N95
1080p
low183 FPS120 FPS
medium168 FPS120 FPS
high139 FPS107 FPS
ultra119 FPS84 FPS
1440p
low153 FPS120 FPS
medium132 FPS112 FPS
high106 FPS87 FPS
ultra89 FPS68 FPS
4K
low87 FPS68 FPS
medium81 FPS57 FPS
high64 FPS44 FPS
ultra49 FPS35 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore i5-12400FProcessor N95
1080p
low471 FPS107 FPS
medium397 FPS92 FPS
high341 FPS85 FPS
ultra301 FPS66 FPS
1440p
low407 FPS93 FPS
medium351 FPS79 FPS
high309 FPS74 FPS
ultra265 FPS60 FPS
4K
low282 FPS72 FPS
medium248 FPS64 FPS
high229 FPS52 FPS
ultra196 FPS40 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore i5-12400FProcessor N95
1080p
low488 FPS120 FPS
medium488 FPS120 FPS
high488 FPS120 FPS
ultra488 FPS120 FPS
1440p
low488 FPS120 FPS
medium488 FPS120 FPS
high485 FPS120 FPS
ultra434 FPS120 FPS
4K
low442 FPS120 FPS
medium389 FPS120 FPS
high337 FPS120 FPS
ultra274 FPS120 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore i5-12400FProcessor N95
1080p
low488 FPS120 FPS
medium488 FPS120 FPS
high488 FPS120 FPS
ultra488 FPS120 FPS
1440p
low488 FPS120 FPS
medium488 FPS120 FPS
high488 FPS120 FPS
ultra473 FPS120 FPS
4K
low488 FPS120 FPS
medium450 FPS120 FPS
high391 FPS120 FPS
ultra330 FPS120 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-12400F and Processor N95

Intel

Core i5-12400F

The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.

Intel

Processor N95

The Processor N95 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-N (2023) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 0.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): + 6 MB. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 4,783 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Core i5-12400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Processor N95 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Core i5-12400F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F versus 3.4 GHz on the Processor N95 — a 25.6% clock advantage for the Core i5-12400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 0.1 GHz). The Core i5-12400F uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Processor N95 uses Alder Lake-N (2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12400F scores 19,532 against the Processor N95's 4,783 — a 121.3% lead for the Core i5-12400F. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F vs 6 MB (total) on the Processor N95.

FeatureCore i5-12400FProcessor N95
Cores / Threads
6 / 12+50%
4 / 4
Boost Clock
4.4 GHz+29%
3.4 GHz
Base Clock
2.5 GHz+2400%
0.1 GHz
L3 Cache
18 MB (total)+200%
6 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)
2 MB (total)+60%
Process
Intel 7 nm-30%
10 nm
Architecture
Alder Lake-S (2022)
Alder Lake-N (2023)
PassMark
19,532+308%
4,783
Cinebench R23 Multi
12,380
Geekbench 6 Single
1,700
Geekbench 6 Multi
657
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-12400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Processor N95 uses FCBGA1264 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i5-12400FProcessor N95
Socket
LGA1700
FCBGA1264
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F) / not specified (Processor N95). Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600.

FeatureCore i5-12400FProcessor N95
Integrated GPU
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Gaming Performance/Value
💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-12400F launched at $174 MSRP, while the Processor N95 debuted at $160. On MSRP ($174 vs $160), the Processor N95 is $14 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-12400F delivers 112.3 pts/$ vs 29.9 pts/$ for the Processor N95 — making the Core i5-12400F the 115.9% better value option.

FeatureCore i5-12400FProcessor N95
MSRP
$174
$160-8%
Performance per Dollar
112.3+276%
29.9
Release Date
2022
2023