
Core i5-12400F
Popular choices:

Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-12400F
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +33.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $174 MSRP, while Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE
2024Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12400F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (18,945 vs 19,532).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Core i5-12400F
2022Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +33.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $174 MSRP, while Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12400F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (18,945 vs 19,532).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-12400F better than Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 168 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 106 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 106 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 66 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 34 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 471 FPS | 199 FPS |
| medium | 397 FPS | 168 FPS |
| high | 341 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 116 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 407 FPS | 174 FPS |
| medium | 351 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 309 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 265 FPS | 105 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 282 FPS | 125 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 110 FPS |
| high | 229 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 62 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 474 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 474 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 426 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 371 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 474 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 399 FPS |
| high | 485 FPS | 343 FPS |
| ultra | 434 FPS | 302 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 357 FPS |
| medium | 389 FPS | 277 FPS |
| high | 337 FPS | 227 FPS |
| ultra | 274 FPS | 182 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 474 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 474 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 474 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 474 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 474 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 474 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 474 FPS |
| ultra | 473 FPS | 420 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 443 FPS |
| medium | 450 FPS | 390 FPS |
| high | 391 FPS | 347 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 301 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-12400F and Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE

Core i5-12400F
Core i5-12400F
The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.


Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE
Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE
The Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE is manufactured by AMD. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 18,945 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i5-12400F is built on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i5-12400F scores 19,532 against the Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE's 18,945 — a 3.1% lead for the Core i5-12400F.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | — |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | — |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total) | — |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | — |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | — |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-S (2022) | — |
| PassMark | 19,532+3% | 18,945 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 12,380 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,700 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 657 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-12400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE uses AM5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F) / not specified (Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE). Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Gaming Performance/Value | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-12400F launched at $174 MSRP, while the Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE debuted at $0. On MSRP ($174 vs $0), the Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE is $174 cheaper.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $174 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 112.3 | — |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












