
Core i5-12400F
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 7235HS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-12400F
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +61.3% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+125% larger total L3 cache (18 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 5 7235HS.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $174 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 7235HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
Ryzen 5 7235HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12400F across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (12,379 vs 19,532).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 18 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Core i5-12400F
2022Ryzen 5 7235HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +61.3% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+125% larger total L3 cache (18 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 5 7235HS.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $174 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 7235HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12400F across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (12,379 vs 19,532).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 18 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-12400F better than Ryzen 5 7235HS?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen 5 7235HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 161 FPS |
| medium | 168 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 106 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 74 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen 5 7235HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 471 FPS | 269 FPS |
| medium | 397 FPS | 232 FPS |
| high | 341 FPS | 211 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 180 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 407 FPS | 232 FPS |
| medium | 351 FPS | 200 FPS |
| high | 309 FPS | 186 FPS |
| ultra | 265 FPS | 157 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 282 FPS | 181 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 160 FPS |
| high | 229 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 104 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen 5 7235HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 309 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 309 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 309 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 309 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 309 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 309 FPS |
| high | 485 FPS | 309 FPS |
| ultra | 434 FPS | 309 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 309 FPS |
| medium | 389 FPS | 305 FPS |
| high | 337 FPS | 268 FPS |
| ultra | 274 FPS | 221 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen 5 7235HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 309 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 309 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 309 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 309 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 309 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 309 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 309 FPS |
| ultra | 473 FPS | 309 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 309 FPS |
| medium | 450 FPS | 309 FPS |
| high | 391 FPS | 309 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 309 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-12400F and Ryzen 5 7235HS

Core i5-12400F
Core i5-12400F
The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.


Ryzen 5 7235HS
Ryzen 5 7235HS
The Ryzen 5 7235HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 12,379 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core i5-12400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 5 7235HS offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i5-12400F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7235HS — a 4.7% clock advantage for the Core i5-12400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i5-12400F uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 5 7235HS uses Rembrandt-R (2023−2025) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12400F scores 19,532 against the Ryzen 5 7235HS's 12,379 — a 44.8% lead for the Core i5-12400F. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 7235HS.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen 5 7235HS |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12+50% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+5% | 4.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.2 GHz+28% |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total)+125% | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+150% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 6 nm-14% |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-S (2022) | Rembrandt-R (2023−2025) |
| PassMark | 19,532+58% | 12,379 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 12,380 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,700 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 657 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-12400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 7235HS uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen 5 7235HS |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FP7 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F) / not specified (Ryzen 5 7235HS). Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen 5 7235HS |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Gaming Performance/Value | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











