
Core i5-12400F
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 7545U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-12400F
2022Why buy it
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 5 7545U.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,532 vs 20,185).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $174 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 7545U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 7545U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 5 7545U
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 740M, while Core i5-12400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Core i5-12400F
2022Ryzen 5 7545U
2023Why buy it
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 5 7545U.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 740M, while Core i5-12400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,532 vs 20,185).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $174 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 7545U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 7545U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 7545U better than Core i5-12400F?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen 5 7545U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 265 FPS |
| medium | 168 FPS | 237 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 198 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 170 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 232 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 187 FPS |
| high | 106 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 102 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 89 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen 5 7545U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 471 FPS | 434 FPS |
| medium | 397 FPS | 341 FPS |
| high | 341 FPS | 293 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 250 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 407 FPS | 362 FPS |
| medium | 351 FPS | 297 FPS |
| high | 309 FPS | 262 FPS |
| ultra | 265 FPS | 219 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 282 FPS | 272 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 227 FPS |
| high | 229 FPS | 206 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 171 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen 5 7545U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 505 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 505 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 505 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 505 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 505 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 505 FPS |
| high | 485 FPS | 505 FPS |
| ultra | 434 FPS | 445 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 503 FPS |
| medium | 389 FPS | 438 FPS |
| high | 337 FPS | 374 FPS |
| ultra | 274 FPS | 309 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen 5 7545U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 505 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 505 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 505 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 505 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 505 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 505 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 505 FPS |
| ultra | 473 FPS | 505 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 505 FPS |
| medium | 450 FPS | 489 FPS |
| high | 391 FPS | 434 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 370 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-12400F and Ryzen 5 7545U

Core i5-12400F
Core i5-12400F
The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.


Ryzen 5 7545U
Ryzen 5 7545U
The Ryzen 5 7545U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2 November 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix (Zen4) (2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 20,185 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
Both the Core i5-12400F and Ryzen 5 7545U share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7545U — a 10.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 7545U (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i5-12400F uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 5 7545U uses Phoenix (Zen4) (2023) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12400F scores 19,532 against the Ryzen 5 7545U's 20,185 — a 3.3% lead for the Ryzen 5 7545U. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 7545U.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen 5 7545U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 4.9 GHz+11% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.2 GHz+28% |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total)+13% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+25% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-S (2022) | Phoenix (Zen4) (2023) |
| PassMark | 19,532 | 20,185+3% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 12,380 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,700 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 657 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-12400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 7545U uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Core i5-12400F supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen 5 7545U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FP7 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | DDR5-5600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+100% | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 5 7545U). The Ryzen 5 7545U includes integrated graphics (Radeon 740M), while the Core i5-12400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value, Ryzen 5 7545U targets Mobile. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen 5 7545U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon 740M |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Gaming Performance/Value | Mobile |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











