
Core i5-12400F
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 PRO 220
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-12400F
2022Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 5 PRO 220.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 PRO 220 across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,532 vs 19,889).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $174 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 PRO 220 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌983.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 6W.
Ryzen 5 PRO 220
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.5% higher average FPS across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 6W instead of 65W, a 59W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Core i5-12400F
2022Ryzen 5 PRO 220
2025Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 5 PRO 220.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.5% higher average FPS across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 6W instead of 65W, a 59W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 PRO 220 across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,532 vs 19,889).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $174 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 PRO 220 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌983.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 6W.
Trade-offs
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 PRO 220 better than Core i5-12400F?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen 5 PRO 220 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 259 FPS |
| medium | 168 FPS | 237 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 199 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 171 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 229 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 191 FPS |
| high | 106 FPS | 155 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 137 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 92 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen 5 PRO 220 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 471 FPS | 386 FPS |
| medium | 397 FPS | 320 FPS |
| high | 341 FPS | 284 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 248 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 407 FPS | 324 FPS |
| medium | 351 FPS | 280 FPS |
| high | 309 FPS | 255 FPS |
| ultra | 265 FPS | 218 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 282 FPS | 243 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 229 FPS | 201 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 169 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen 5 PRO 220 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 497 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 497 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 497 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 497 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 497 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 497 FPS |
| high | 485 FPS | 497 FPS |
| ultra | 434 FPS | 430 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 484 FPS |
| medium | 389 FPS | 425 FPS |
| high | 337 FPS | 362 FPS |
| ultra | 274 FPS | 299 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen 5 PRO 220 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 497 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 497 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 497 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 497 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 497 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 497 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 497 FPS |
| ultra | 473 FPS | 497 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 497 FPS |
| medium | 450 FPS | 497 FPS |
| high | 391 FPS | 441 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 377 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-12400F and Ryzen 5 PRO 220

Core i5-12400F
Core i5-12400F
The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.


Ryzen 5 PRO 220
Ryzen 5 PRO 220
The Ryzen 5 PRO 220 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP7r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 MB + 16 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 19,889 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
Both the Core i5-12400F and Ryzen 5 PRO 220 share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 — a 10.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i5-12400F uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 uses Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12400F scores 19,532 against the Ryzen 5 PRO 220's 19,889 — a 1.8% lead for the Ryzen 5 PRO 220. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F vs 16 MB on the Ryzen 5 PRO 220.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen 5 PRO 220 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 4.9 GHz+11% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.2 GHz+28% |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total)+13% | 16 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 6 MB+380% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-S (2022) | Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025) |
| PassMark | 19,532 | 19,889+2% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 12,380 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,700 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 657 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-12400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 uses FP7/FP7r2 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen 5 PRO 220 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FP7/FP7r2 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F) / not specified (Ryzen 5 PRO 220). Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen 5 PRO 220 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Gaming Performance/Value | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-12400F launched at $174 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 debuted at $0. On MSRP ($174 vs $0), the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 is $174 cheaper.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen 5 PRO 220 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $174 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 112.3 | — |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











