PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-12400F

2022

Why buy it

✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (19,532 vs 21,287).
❌Launch MSRP is still $174 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌983.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 6W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 6W instead of 65W, a 59W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 760M, while Core i5-12400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.

Core i5-12400F

2022

Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U

2023

Why buy it

✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 6W instead of 65W, a 59W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 760M, while Core i5-12400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (19,532 vs 21,287).
❌Launch MSRP is still $174 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌983.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 6W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U better than Core i5-12400F?

Yes. Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 6.2% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data, 9% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 6.2% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U is the better fit. You are getting 9% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-12400F makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $174 MSRP, and it gives you a 6.2% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-12400F is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (112.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2022) and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 6/12. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-12400F Benchmark Check

Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-12400F	Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U
1080p
low	183 FPS	265 FPS
medium	168 FPS	240 FPS
high	139 FPS	201 FPS
ultra	119 FPS	173 FPS
1440p
low	153 FPS	232 FPS
medium	132 FPS	191 FPS
high	106 FPS	156 FPS
ultra	89 FPS	138 FPS
4K
low	87 FPS	161 FPS
medium	81 FPS	134 FPS
high	64 FPS	104 FPS
ultra	49 FPS	92 FPS

Open Core i5-12400F Open Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-12400F	Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U
1080p
low	471 FPS	390 FPS
medium	397 FPS	323 FPS
high	341 FPS	286 FPS
ultra	301 FPS	250 FPS
1440p
low	407 FPS	327 FPS
medium	351 FPS	282 FPS
high	309 FPS	257 FPS
ultra	265 FPS	220 FPS
4K
low	282 FPS	245 FPS
medium	248 FPS	216 FPS
high	229 FPS	202 FPS
ultra	196 FPS	170 FPS

Open Core i5-12400F Open Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-12400F	Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U
1080p
low	488 FPS	532 FPS
medium	488 FPS	532 FPS
high	488 FPS	532 FPS
ultra	488 FPS	527 FPS
1440p
low	488 FPS	532 FPS
medium	488 FPS	532 FPS
high	485 FPS	509 FPS
ultra	434 FPS	439 FPS
4K
low	442 FPS	494 FPS
medium	389 FPS	434 FPS
high	337 FPS	370 FPS
ultra	274 FPS	305 FPS

Open Core i5-12400F Open Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-12400F	Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U
1080p
low	488 FPS	532 FPS
medium	488 FPS	532 FPS
high	488 FPS	532 FPS
ultra	488 FPS	532 FPS
1440p
low	488 FPS	532 FPS
medium	488 FPS	532 FPS
high	488 FPS	532 FPS
ultra	473 FPS	532 FPS
4K
low	488 FPS	532 FPS
medium	450 FPS	501 FPS
high	391 FPS	444 FPS
ultra	330 FPS	381 FPS

Open Core i5-12400F Open Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-12400F and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U

Core i5-12400F

The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.

Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U

The Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 May 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix (Zen4) (2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 MB + 16 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5x-7500, DDR5-5600. Passmark benchmark score: 21,287 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i5-12400F and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U — a 10.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i5-12400F uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U uses Phoenix (Zen4) (2023) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12400F scores 19,532 against the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U's 21,287 — a 8.6% lead for the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F vs 16 MB on the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U.

Feature	Core i5-12400F	Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	6 / 12
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz	4.9 GHz+11%
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	3.5 GHz+40%
L3 Cache	18 MB (total)+13%	16 MB
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	6 MB+380%
Process	Intel 7 nm	4 nm-43%
Architecture	Alder Lake-S (2022)	Phoenix (Zen4) (2023)
PassMark	19,532	21,287+9%
Cinebench R23 Multi	12,380	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,700	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	657	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-12400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U uses FP7/FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-12400F versus 5600 on the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U — the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U supports 199.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U supports up to 256 of RAM compared to 128 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes.

Feature	Core i5-12400F	Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U
Socket	LGA1700	FP7/FP8
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200	5600+111900%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB+52428700%	256
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	20

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F) vs true (Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U). The Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U includes integrated graphics (Radeon 760M), while the Core i5-12400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600.