Core i5-12400F vs Ryzen 7 1700

CPU

GPU

Core i5-12400F

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2022

Core family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Ryzen 7 1700

8 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2017

Ryzen family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Core i5-12400F vs Ryzen 7 1700 Performance Spectrum

Core i5-12400F

6 / 12

19,532

+32.2%

14,772

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-12400F vs Ryzen 7 1700 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-12400F vs Ryzen 7 1700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-12400F

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +20.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌
24.3% HIGHER MSRP
$174 MSRPvs$140 MSRP

Ryzen 7 1700

2017

Why buy it

✅Costs $34 less on MSRP ($140 MSRP vs $174 MSRP).
✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (8,065 vs 12,380).
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i5-12400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-12400F better than Ryzen 7 1700?

Yes. Core i5-12400F is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 20.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 53.5% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, 32.2% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-12400F is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 20.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-12400F is the stronger fit. You are getting 53.5% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-12400F is the better buy right now. Core i5-12400F comes in 24.3% more expensive on MSRP at $174 MSRP versus $140 MSRP, and it still gives you a 20.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 6.4% better value on MSRP (112.3 vs 105.5 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible AM4 + DDR4 setup, Ryzen 7 1700 can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-12400F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2017), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of AM4, and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 8/16. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i5-12400F vs Ryzen 7 1700 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-12400F

The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.

Ryzen 7 1700

The Ryzen 7 1700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2 March 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 16384 kB. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,772 points. Launch price was $329.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-12400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 7 1700 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 1700 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F versus 3.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 1700 — a 17.3% clock advantage for the Core i5-12400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i5-12400F uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 7 1700 uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12400F scores 19,532 against the Ryzen 7 1700's 14,772 — a 27.8% lead for the Core i5-12400F. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 12,380 vs 8,065 (42.2% advantage for the Core i5-12400F). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,700 vs 1,000, a 51.9% lead for the Core i5-12400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 657 vs 5,000 (153.5% advantage for the Ryzen 7 1700). L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F vs 16384 kB on the Ryzen 7 1700.

Feature	Core i5-12400F	Ryzen 7 1700
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	8 / 16+33%
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz+19%	3.7 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	3 GHz+20%
L3 Cache	18 MB (total)+13%	16384 kB
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	4096 kB+220%
Process	Intel 7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Alder Lake-S (2022)	Zen (2017−2020)
PassMark	19,532+32%	14,772
Cinebench R23 Multi	12,380+54%	8,065
Geekbench 6 Single	1,700+70%	1,000
Geekbench 6 Multi	657	5,000+661%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-12400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 1700 uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-12400F versus DDR4-2666 on the Ryzen 7 1700 — the Core i5-12400F supports 80% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-12400F) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 1700) — the Ryzen 7 1700 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-12400F) and B350,X370,B450,X470,A520,B550,X570 (Ryzen 7 1700).

Feature	Core i5-12400F	Ryzen 7 1700
Socket	LGA1700	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+80%	DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	128 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	24+20%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 1700). Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value, Ryzen 7 1700 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600; Ryzen 7 1700 rivals Core i7-7700K.

Feature	Core i5-12400F	Ryzen 7 1700
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	—	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	AMD-V
Target Use	Gaming Performance/Value	Workstation

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-12400F was priced at $174, while the Ryzen 7 1700 came in at $140. On launch pricing ($174 vs $140), Ryzen 7 1700 was $34 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-12400F delivers 112.3 pts/$ vs 105.5 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 1700 — making the Core i5-12400F the 6.2% better value option.

Feature	Core i5-12400F	Ryzen 7 1700
MSRP	$174	$140-20%
Performance per Dollar	112.3+6%	105.5
Release Date	2022	2017

Search Core i5-12400F on Amazon

Search Ryzen 7 1700 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.