Core i5-12400F vs Ryzen 7 250

Intel

Core i5-12400F

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2022

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen 7 250

8 Cores16 Thrd28 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2025

Popular choices:

i5-12400F

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-12400F

2022

Why buy it

  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 7 250.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 250 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (19,532 vs 25,677).
  • Launch MSRP is still $174 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 250 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.

Ryzen 7 250

2025

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +22.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 250 better than Core i5-12400F?
Yes. Ryzen 7 250 is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 22.3% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data, 31.5% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 7 250 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 22.3% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 250 is the better fit. You are getting 31.5% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 7 250 is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-12400F makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Ryzen 7 250 is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $174 MSRP, and it gives you a 22.3% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-12400F is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (112.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 7 250 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2022) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 6/12. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore i5-12400FRyzen 7 250
1080p
low183 FPS255 FPS
medium168 FPS235 FPS
high139 FPS198 FPS
ultra119 FPS170 FPS
1440p
low153 FPS227 FPS
medium132 FPS189 FPS
high106 FPS154 FPS
ultra89 FPS136 FPS
4K
low87 FPS157 FPS
medium81 FPS133 FPS
high64 FPS103 FPS
ultra49 FPS91 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore i5-12400FRyzen 7 250
1080p
low471 FPS469 FPS
medium397 FPS388 FPS
high341 FPS336 FPS
ultra301 FPS301 FPS
1440p
low407 FPS410 FPS
medium351 FPS358 FPS
high309 FPS310 FPS
ultra265 FPS265 FPS
4K
low282 FPS270 FPS
medium248 FPS247 FPS
high229 FPS234 FPS
ultra196 FPS202 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore i5-12400FRyzen 7 250
1080p
low488 FPS642 FPS
medium488 FPS642 FPS
high488 FPS642 FPS
ultra488 FPS594 FPS
1440p
low488 FPS642 FPS
medium488 FPS622 FPS
high485 FPS525 FPS
ultra434 FPS451 FPS
4K
low442 FPS521 FPS
medium389 FPS458 FPS
high337 FPS406 FPS
ultra274 FPS345 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore i5-12400FRyzen 7 250
1080p
low488 FPS642 FPS
medium488 FPS642 FPS
high488 FPS642 FPS
ultra488 FPS642 FPS
1440p
low488 FPS642 FPS
medium488 FPS642 FPS
high488 FPS633 FPS
ultra473 FPS548 FPS
4K
low488 FPS559 FPS
medium450 FPS501 FPS
high391 FPS446 FPS
ultra330 FPS384 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-12400F and Ryzen 7 250

Intel

Core i5-12400F

The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.

AMD

Ryzen 7 250

The Ryzen 7 250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 25,677 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The Core i5-12400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 7 250 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 250 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 250 — a 14.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 250 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i5-12400F uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 7 250 uses Hawk Point (2024−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12400F scores 19,532 against the Ryzen 7 250's 25,677 — a 27.2% lead for the Ryzen 7 250. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 250.

FeatureCore i5-12400FRyzen 7 250
Cores / Threads
6 / 12
8 / 16+33%
Boost Clock
4.4 GHz
5.1 GHz+16%
Base Clock
2.5 GHz
3.3 GHz+32%
L3 Cache
18 MB (total)+13%
16 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)+25%
1 MB (per core)
Process
Intel 7 nm
4 nm-43%
Architecture
Alder Lake-S (2022)
Hawk Point (2024−2025)
PassMark
19,532
25,677+31%
Cinebench R23 Multi
12,380
Geekbench 6 Single
1,700
Geekbench 6 Multi
657
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-12400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 250 uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i5-12400FRyzen 7 250
Socket
LGA1700
FP8
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F) / not specified (Ryzen 7 250). Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600.

FeatureCore i5-12400FRyzen 7 250
Integrated GPU
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Gaming Performance/Value
💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-12400F launched at $174 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 250 debuted at $0. On MSRP ($174 vs $0), the Ryzen 7 250 is $174 cheaper.

FeatureCore i5-12400FRyzen 7 250
MSRP
$174
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
112.3
Release Date
2022
2025