
Core i5-12400F
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 3750H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-12400F
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +121.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+350% larger total L3 cache (18 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of FP5 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 7 3750H.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $174 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 3750H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
Ryzen 7 3750H
2019Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12400F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (7,990 vs 19,532).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 18 MB).
- ❌Older platform position on FP5 with DDR4, while Core i5-12400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Core i5-12400F
2022Ryzen 7 3750H
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +121.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+350% larger total L3 cache (18 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of FP5 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 7 3750H.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $174 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 3750H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12400F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (7,990 vs 19,532).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 18 MB).
- ❌Older platform position on FP5 with DDR4, while Core i5-12400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-12400F better than Ryzen 7 3750H?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen 7 3750H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 168 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 142 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 106 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 37 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen 7 3750H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 471 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 397 FPS | 179 FPS |
| high | 341 FPS | 164 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 131 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 407 FPS | 178 FPS |
| medium | 351 FPS | 153 FPS |
| high | 309 FPS | 139 FPS |
| ultra | 265 FPS | 116 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 282 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 229 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 68 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen 7 3750H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 200 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 200 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 200 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 200 FPS |
| high | 485 FPS | 200 FPS |
| ultra | 434 FPS | 200 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 389 FPS | 200 FPS |
| high | 337 FPS | 200 FPS |
| ultra | 274 FPS | 200 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen 7 3750H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 200 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 200 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 200 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 200 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 200 FPS |
| ultra | 473 FPS | 200 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 450 FPS | 200 FPS |
| high | 391 FPS | 200 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 200 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-12400F and Ryzen 7 3750H

Core i5-12400F
Core i5-12400F
The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.


Ryzen 7 3750H
Ryzen 7 3750H
The Ryzen 7 3750H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Picasso (Zen+) (2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,990 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core i5-12400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 7 3750H offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i5-12400F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F versus 4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3750H — a 9.5% clock advantage for the Core i5-12400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Core i5-12400F uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 7 3750H uses Picasso (Zen+) (2019) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12400F scores 19,532 against the Ryzen 7 3750H's 7,990 — a 83.9% lead for the Core i5-12400F. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 3750H.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen 7 3750H |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12+50% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+10% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz+9% | 2.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total)+350% | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+150% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-42% | 12 nm |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-S (2022) | Picasso (Zen+) (2019) |
| PassMark | 19,532+144% | 7,990 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 12,380 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,700 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 657 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-12400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 3750H uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen 7 3750H |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F) / not specified (Ryzen 7 3750H). Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen 7 3750H |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Gaming Performance/Value | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












