
Core i5-12400F
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 5825U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-12400F
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +19.5% higher average FPS across 6 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of FP6 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 7 5825U.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $174 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 5825U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
Ryzen 7 5825U
2022Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12400F across 6 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (18,050 vs 19,532).
- ❌Older platform position on FP6 with DDR4, while Core i5-12400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Core i5-12400F
2022Ryzen 7 5825U
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +19.5% higher average FPS across 6 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of FP6 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 7 5825U.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $174 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 5825U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12400F across 6 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (18,050 vs 19,532).
- ❌Older platform position on FP6 with DDR4, while Core i5-12400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-12400F better than Ryzen 7 5825U?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen 7 5825U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 168 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 101 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 148 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 106 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 84 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 82 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 46 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen 7 5825U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 471 FPS | 236 FPS |
| medium | 397 FPS | 201 FPS |
| high | 341 FPS | 176 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 156 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 407 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 351 FPS | 179 FPS |
| high | 309 FPS | 161 FPS |
| ultra | 265 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 282 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 127 FPS |
| high | 229 FPS | 121 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 106 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen 7 5825U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 451 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 451 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 451 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 426 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 451 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 437 FPS |
| high | 485 FPS | 392 FPS |
| ultra | 434 FPS | 324 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 375 FPS |
| medium | 389 FPS | 316 FPS |
| high | 337 FPS | 278 FPS |
| ultra | 274 FPS | 219 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen 7 5825U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 451 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 451 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 451 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 451 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 451 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 451 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 451 FPS |
| ultra | 473 FPS | 451 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 451 FPS |
| medium | 450 FPS | 451 FPS |
| high | 391 FPS | 402 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 345 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-12400F and Ryzen 7 5825U

Core i5-12400F
Core i5-12400F
The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.


Ryzen 7 5825U
Ryzen 7 5825U
The Ryzen 7 5825U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Barcelo-U (Zen 3) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 18,050 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i5-12400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 7 5825U offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 5825U has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5825U — a 2.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 5825U (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i5-12400F uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 7 5825U uses Barcelo-U (Zen 3) (2022−2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12400F scores 19,532 against the Ryzen 7 5825U's 18,050 — a 7.9% lead for the Core i5-12400F. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 5825U.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen 7 5825U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 4.5 GHz+2% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz+25% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total)+13% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+150% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-S (2022) | Barcelo-U (Zen 3) (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 19,532+8% | 18,050 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 12,380 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,700 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 657 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-12400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 5825U uses FP6 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen 7 5825U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FP6 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F) / not specified (Ryzen 7 5825U). Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen 7 5825U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Gaming Performance/Value | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











