Core i5-12400F vs Ryzen 9 5900H

Intel

Core i5-12400F

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2022

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen 9 5900H

8 Cores16 Thrd45 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2021

Popular choices:

i5-12400F

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-12400F

2022

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +5.0% higher average FPS across 39 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of FP6 and older memory support.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 9 5900H.

Trade-offs

  • Launch MSRP is still $174 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 5900H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.

Ryzen 9 5900H

2021

Why buy it

  • Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12400F across 39 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (13,510 vs 19,532).
  • Older platform position on FP6, while Core i5-12400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-12400F better than Ryzen 9 5900H?
Yes. Core i5-12400F is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 5.0% average FPS lead across 39 shared CPU game tests in our data, 44.6% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i5-12400F is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 5.0% more average FPS across 39 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-12400F is the better fit. You are getting 44.6% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i5-12400F is the smarter buy today. Core i5-12400F is at an unclear MSRP at $174 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 5.0% average FPS lead across 39 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (112.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-12400F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2021), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of FP6, and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 8/16. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore i5-12400FRyzen 9 5900H
1080p
low183 FPS181 FPS
medium168 FPS147 FPS
high139 FPS122 FPS
ultra119 FPS99 FPS
1440p
low153 FPS147 FPS
medium132 FPS116 FPS
high106 FPS95 FPS
ultra89 FPS78 FPS
4K
low87 FPS81 FPS
medium81 FPS69 FPS
high64 FPS55 FPS
ultra49 FPS43 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore i5-12400FRyzen 9 5900H
1080p
low471 FPS338 FPS
medium397 FPS338 FPS
high341 FPS327 FPS
ultra301 FPS288 FPS
1440p
low407 FPS338 FPS
medium351 FPS338 FPS
high309 FPS300 FPS
ultra265 FPS256 FPS
4K
low282 FPS278 FPS
medium248 FPS246 FPS
high229 FPS227 FPS
ultra196 FPS197 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore i5-12400FRyzen 9 5900H
1080p
low488 FPS338 FPS
medium488 FPS338 FPS
high488 FPS338 FPS
ultra488 FPS338 FPS
1440p
low488 FPS338 FPS
medium488 FPS338 FPS
high485 FPS338 FPS
ultra434 FPS338 FPS
4K
low442 FPS338 FPS
medium389 FPS338 FPS
high337 FPS326 FPS
ultra274 FPS259 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore i5-12400FRyzen 9 5900H
1080p
low488 FPS338 FPS
medium488 FPS338 FPS
high488 FPS338 FPS
ultra488 FPS338 FPS
1440p
low488 FPS338 FPS
medium488 FPS338 FPS
high488 FPS338 FPS
ultra473 FPS338 FPS
4K
low488 FPS338 FPS
medium450 FPS338 FPS
high391 FPS338 FPS
ultra330 FPS338 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-12400F and Ryzen 9 5900H

Intel

Core i5-12400F

The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.

AMD

Ryzen 9 5900H

The Ryzen 9 5900H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 January 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Cezanne U (Zen 3) (2021−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 13,510 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Core i5-12400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 9 5900H offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 9 5900H has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F versus 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5900H — a 4.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 5900H (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i5-12400F uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 9 5900H uses Cezanne U (Zen 3) (2021−2022) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12400F scores 19,532 against the Ryzen 9 5900H's 13,510 — a 36.5% lead for the Core i5-12400F. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F vs 16 MB on the Ryzen 9 5900H.

FeatureCore i5-12400FRyzen 9 5900H
Cores / Threads
6 / 12
8 / 16+33%
Boost Clock
4.4 GHz
4.6 GHz+5%
Base Clock
2.5 GHz
3.3 GHz+32%
L3 Cache
18 MB (total)+13%
16 MB
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)
4 MB+220%
Process
Intel 7 nm
7 nm
Architecture
Alder Lake-S (2022)
Cezanne U (Zen 3) (2021−2022)
PassMark
19,532+45%
13,510
Cinebench R23 Multi
12,380
Geekbench 6 Single
1,700
Geekbench 6 Multi
657
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-12400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 9 5900H uses FP6 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i5-12400FRyzen 9 5900H
Socket
LGA1700
FP6
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F) / not specified (Ryzen 9 5900H). Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600.

FeatureCore i5-12400FRyzen 9 5900H
Integrated GPU
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Gaming Performance/Value