Core i5-12400F vs Ryzen 9 5900HS

Intel

Core i5-12400F

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2022

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen 9 5900HS

8 Cores16 Thrd35 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2021

Popular choices:

i5-12400F

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-12400F

2022

Why buy it

  • Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of FP6 and DDR4.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 9 5900HS.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (19,532 vs 21,214).
  • Launch MSRP is still $174 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 5900HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.

Ryzen 9 5900HS

2021

Why buy it

  • Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Older platform position on FP6 with DDR4, while Core i5-12400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 9 5900HS better than Core i5-12400F?
Yes. Ryzen 9 5900HS is the better overall CPU here. You are getting 8.6% better PassMark, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 9 5900HS is the better fit because it leads the single-thread side of the matchup with 4.5% higher max boost clock.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 9 5900HS is the better fit. You are getting 8.6% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 9 5900HS is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-12400F makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Ryzen 9 5900HS is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $174 MSRP, and it gives you 8.6% higher PassMark. Core i5-12400F is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (112.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-12400F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2021) and a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of FP6. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore i5-12400FRyzen 9 5900HS
1080p
low183 FPS171 FPS
medium168 FPS149 FPS
high139 FPS121 FPS
ultra119 FPS100 FPS
1440p
low153 FPS146 FPS
medium132 FPS123 FPS
high106 FPS99 FPS
ultra89 FPS83 FPS
4K
low87 FPS79 FPS
medium81 FPS72 FPS
high64 FPS57 FPS
ultra49 FPS44 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore i5-12400FRyzen 9 5900HS
1080p
low471 FPS411 FPS
medium397 FPS351 FPS
high341 FPS306 FPS
ultra301 FPS270 FPS
1440p
low407 FPS355 FPS
medium351 FPS315 FPS
high309 FPS280 FPS
ultra265 FPS239 FPS
4K
low282 FPS245 FPS
medium248 FPS223 FPS
high229 FPS211 FPS
ultra196 FPS183 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore i5-12400FRyzen 9 5900HS
1080p
low488 FPS530 FPS
medium488 FPS530 FPS
high488 FPS530 FPS
ultra488 FPS496 FPS
1440p
low488 FPS530 FPS
medium488 FPS465 FPS
high485 FPS424 FPS
ultra434 FPS359 FPS
4K
low442 FPS400 FPS
medium389 FPS337 FPS
high337 FPS300 FPS
ultra274 FPS241 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore i5-12400FRyzen 9 5900HS
1080p
low488 FPS530 FPS
medium488 FPS530 FPS
high488 FPS530 FPS
ultra488 FPS530 FPS
1440p
low488 FPS530 FPS
medium488 FPS530 FPS
high488 FPS530 FPS
ultra473 FPS516 FPS
4K
low488 FPS530 FPS
medium450 FPS478 FPS
high391 FPS427 FPS
ultra330 FPS373 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-12400F and Ryzen 9 5900HS

Intel

Core i5-12400F

The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.

AMD

Ryzen 9 5900HS

The Ryzen 9 5900HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 12 January 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Cezanne-HS (Zen 3) (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 21,214 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The Core i5-12400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 9 5900HS offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 9 5900HS has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F versus 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5900HS — a 4.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 5900HS (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i5-12400F uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 9 5900HS uses Cezanne-HS (Zen 3) (2021) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12400F scores 19,532 against the Ryzen 9 5900HS's 21,214 — a 8.3% lead for the Ryzen 9 5900HS. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 5900HS.

FeatureCore i5-12400FRyzen 9 5900HS
Cores / Threads
6 / 12
8 / 16+33%
Boost Clock
4.4 GHz
4.6 GHz+5%
Base Clock
2.5 GHz
3 GHz+20%
L3 Cache
18 MB (total)+13%
16 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)+150%
512 kB (per core)
Process
Intel 7 nm
7 nm
Architecture
Alder Lake-S (2022)
Cezanne-HS (Zen 3) (2021)
PassMark
19,532
21,214+9%
Cinebench R23 Multi
12,380
Geekbench 6 Single
1,700
Geekbench 6 Multi
657
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-12400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 9 5900HS uses FP6 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i5-12400FRyzen 9 5900HS
Socket
LGA1700
FP6
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F) / not specified (Ryzen 9 5900HS). Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600.

FeatureCore i5-12400FRyzen 9 5900HS
Integrated GPU
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Gaming Performance/Value