
Core i5-12400F
Popular choices:

Ryzen AI 7 350
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-12400F
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+125% larger total L3 cache (18 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen AI 7 350.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,532 vs 24,897).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $174 MSRP, while Ryzen AI 7 350 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.
Ryzen AI 7 350
2025Why buy it
- ✅+27.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12400F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 18 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Core i5-12400F
2022Ryzen AI 7 350
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+125% larger total L3 cache (18 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen AI 7 350.
Why buy it
- ✅+27.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,532 vs 24,897).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $174 MSRP, while Ryzen AI 7 350 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12400F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 18 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen AI 7 350 better than Core i5-12400F?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen AI 7 350 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 245 FPS |
| medium | 168 FPS | 228 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 194 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 167 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 215 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 106 FPS | 149 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 132 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 126 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 85 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen AI 7 350 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 471 FPS | 212 FPS |
| medium | 397 FPS | 183 FPS |
| high | 341 FPS | 166 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 147 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 407 FPS | 190 FPS |
| medium | 351 FPS | 170 FPS |
| high | 309 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 265 FPS | 131 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 282 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 132 FPS |
| high | 229 FPS | 126 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 107 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen AI 7 350 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 622 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 595 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 512 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 408 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 622 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 506 FPS |
| high | 485 FPS | 435 FPS |
| ultra | 434 FPS | 353 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 436 FPS |
| medium | 389 FPS | 368 FPS |
| high | 337 FPS | 322 FPS |
| ultra | 274 FPS | 261 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen AI 7 350 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 622 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 622 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 622 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 622 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 622 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 622 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 588 FPS |
| ultra | 473 FPS | 506 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 530 FPS |
| medium | 450 FPS | 478 FPS |
| high | 391 FPS | 425 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 369 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-12400F and Ryzen AI 7 350

Core i5-12400F
Core i5-12400F
The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.


Ryzen AI 7 350
Ryzen AI 7 350
The Ryzen AI 7 350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Krackan Point (2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 24,897 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i5-12400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen AI 7 350 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen AI 7 350 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen AI 7 350 — a 12.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI 7 350 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i5-12400F uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen AI 7 350 uses Krackan Point (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12400F scores 19,532 against the Ryzen AI 7 350's 24,897 — a 24.2% lead for the Ryzen AI 7 350. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F vs 8 MB on the Ryzen AI 7 350.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen AI 7 350 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 5 GHz+14% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz+25% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total)+125% | 8 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+25% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-S (2022) | Krackan Point (2025) |
| PassMark | 19,532 | 24,897+27% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 12,380 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,700 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 657 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-12400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen AI 7 350 uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen AI 7 350 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F) / not specified (Ryzen AI 7 350). Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen AI 7 350 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Gaming Performance/Value | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-12400F launched at $174 MSRP, while the Ryzen AI 7 350 debuted at $0. On MSRP ($174 vs $0), the Ryzen AI 7 350 is $174 cheaper.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen AI 7 350 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $174 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 112.3 | — |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











