Core i5-12400F vs Ryzen AI Max PRO 385

CPU

GPU

Core i5-12400F

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2022

Core family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Ryzen AI Max PRO 385

8 Cores16 Thrd55 WWMax: 5 GHz2025

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Core i5-12400F vs Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 Performance Spectrum

Core i5-12400F

6 / 12

19,532

0.0%

31,508

+61.3%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-12400F vs Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-12400F vs Ryzen AI Max PRO 385: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-12400F

2022

Why buy it

✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen AI Max PRO 385.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (12,380 vs 16,500).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $174 MSRP, while Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌18.2% higher power demand at 65W vs 55W.

Ryzen AI Max PRO 385

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +19.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+77.8% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 18 MB).
✅Draws 55W instead of 65W, a 10W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 8050S, while Core i5-12400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 better than Core i5-12400F?

Yes. Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 19.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 33.3% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, 61.3% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 19.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 is the stronger fit. You are getting 33.3% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 77.8% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 18 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-12400F is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $174 MSRP, and it still gives you a 19.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-12400F is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (112.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2022), 77.8% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 18 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 6/12. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i5-12400F vs Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-12400F

The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.

Ryzen AI Max PRO 385

The Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Strix Halo (2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP11. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 31,508 points. Launch price was $499.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-12400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 — a 12.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i5-12400F uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 uses Strix Halo (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12400F scores 19,532 against the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385's 31,508 — a 46.9% lead for the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 12,380 vs 16,500 (28.5% advantage for the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,700 vs 2,886, a 51.7% lead for the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 657 vs 14,136 (182.2% advantage for the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385). L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385.

Feature	Core i5-12400F	Ryzen AI Max PRO 385
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	8 / 16+33%
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz	5 GHz+14%
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	3.6 GHz+44%
L3 Cache	18 MB (total)	32 MB (total)+78%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+25%	1 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	4 nm-43%
Architecture	Alder Lake-S (2022)	Strix Halo (2025)
PassMark	19,532	31,508+61%
Cinebench R23 Multi	12,380	16,500+33%
Geekbench 6 Single	1,700	2,886+70%
Geekbench 6 Multi	657	14,136+2052%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-12400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 uses FP11 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-12400F versus LPDDR5x-8000 on the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 — the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 supports 66.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-12400F) vs 8 (Ryzen AI Max PRO 385). Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-12400F) and Strix Halo platform (Ryzen AI Max PRO 385).

Feature	Core i5-12400F	Ryzen AI Max PRO 385
Socket	LGA1700	FP11
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200	LPDDR5x-8000+67%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	128 GB
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	20	20

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F) vs AMD-V (Ryzen AI Max PRO 385). The Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 includes integrated graphics (Radeon 8050S), while the Core i5-12400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value, Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 targets Enterprise AI Mobile. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600; Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 rivals M3 Max.

Feature	Core i5-12400F	Ryzen AI Max PRO 385
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	Radeon 8050S
Unlocked	—	Yes
AVX-512	—	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	AMD-V
Target Use	Gaming Performance/Value	Enterprise AI Mobile