
Core i5-12400F
Popular choices:

Ryzen Embedded V3C18I
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-12400F
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +56.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $326 less on MSRP ($174 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 305.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 112.3 vs 27.7 PassMark/$ ($174 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen Embedded V3C18I.
Trade-offs
- ❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
Ryzen Embedded V3C18I
2022Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12400F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,856 vs 19,532).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 27.7 vs 112.3 PassMark/$ ($500 MSRP vs $174 MSRP).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Core i5-12400F
2022Ryzen Embedded V3C18I
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +56.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $326 less on MSRP ($174 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 305.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 112.3 vs 27.7 PassMark/$ ($174 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen Embedded V3C18I.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12400F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,856 vs 19,532).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 27.7 vs 112.3 PassMark/$ ($500 MSRP vs $174 MSRP).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-12400F better than Ryzen Embedded V3C18I?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen Embedded V3C18I |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 168 FPS | 138 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 89 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 142 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 106 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen Embedded V3C18I |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 471 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 397 FPS | 151 FPS |
| high | 341 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 109 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 407 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 351 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 309 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 265 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 282 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 229 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 74 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen Embedded V3C18I |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 346 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 346 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 346 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 346 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 346 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 346 FPS |
| high | 485 FPS | 346 FPS |
| ultra | 434 FPS | 346 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 346 FPS |
| medium | 389 FPS | 317 FPS |
| high | 337 FPS | 280 FPS |
| ultra | 274 FPS | 225 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen Embedded V3C18I |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 346 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 346 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 346 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 346 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 346 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 346 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 346 FPS |
| ultra | 473 FPS | 346 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 346 FPS |
| medium | 450 FPS | 346 FPS |
| high | 391 FPS | 346 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 326 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-12400F and Ryzen Embedded V3C18I

Core i5-12400F
Core i5-12400F
The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.


Ryzen Embedded V3C18I
Ryzen Embedded V3C18I
The Ryzen Embedded V3C18I is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt (2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 13,856 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core i5-12400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen Embedded V3C18I offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen Embedded V3C18I has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F versus 3.8 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded V3C18I — a 14.6% clock advantage for the Core i5-12400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 1.9 GHz). The Core i5-12400F uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen Embedded V3C18I uses Rembrandt (2022) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12400F scores 19,532 against the Ryzen Embedded V3C18I's 13,856 — a 34% lead for the Core i5-12400F. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded V3C18I.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen Embedded V3C18I |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+16% | 3.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz+32% | 1.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total)+13% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+150% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 6 nm-14% |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-S (2022) | Rembrandt (2022) |
| PassMark | 19,532+41% | 13,856 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 12,380 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,700 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 657 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-12400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen Embedded V3C18I uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen Embedded V3C18I |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FP7 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F) / not specified (Ryzen Embedded V3C18I). Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen Embedded V3C18I |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Gaming Performance/Value | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-12400F launched at $174 MSRP, while the Ryzen Embedded V3C18I debuted at $500. On MSRP ($174 vs $500), the Core i5-12400F is $326 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-12400F delivers 112.3 pts/$ vs 27.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen Embedded V3C18I — making the Core i5-12400F the 120.8% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen Embedded V3C18I |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $174-65% | $500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 112.3+305% | 27.7 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











