Core i5-12400F vs Ryzen Embedded V3C48

Intel

Core i5-12400F

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2022

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen Embedded V3C48

8 Cores16 Thrd45 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2022

Popular choices:

i5-12400F

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-12400F

2022

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +13.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen Embedded V3C48.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (19,532 vs 20,203).
  • Launch MSRP is still $174 MSRP, while Ryzen Embedded V3C48 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.

Ryzen Embedded V3C48

2022

Why buy it

  • +3.4% higher PassMark.
  • Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12400F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Embedded V3C48 better than Core i5-12400F?
It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Core i5-12400F is ahead with a 13.0% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Embedded V3C48 pulls ahead with 3.4% better PassMark.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Embedded V3C48 is the better fit. You are getting 3.4% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen Embedded V3C48 is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-12400F makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Ryzen Embedded V3C48 is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $174 MSRP, and it gives you 3.4% better PassMark. The trade-off is that Core i5-12400F is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 13.0% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-12400F is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (112.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen Embedded V3C48 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 6/12. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore i5-12400FRyzen Embedded V3C48
1080p
low183 FPS174 FPS
medium168 FPS139 FPS
high139 FPS113 FPS
ultra119 FPS90 FPS
1440p
low153 FPS144 FPS
medium132 FPS113 FPS
high106 FPS90 FPS
ultra89 FPS72 FPS
4K
low87 FPS66 FPS
medium81 FPS55 FPS
high64 FPS44 FPS
ultra49 FPS35 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore i5-12400FRyzen Embedded V3C48
1080p
low471 FPS331 FPS
medium397 FPS281 FPS
high341 FPS240 FPS
ultra301 FPS196 FPS
1440p
low407 FPS286 FPS
medium351 FPS251 FPS
high309 FPS217 FPS
ultra265 FPS177 FPS
4K
low282 FPS206 FPS
medium248 FPS187 FPS
high229 FPS167 FPS
ultra196 FPS134 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore i5-12400FRyzen Embedded V3C48
1080p
low488 FPS505 FPS
medium488 FPS505 FPS
high488 FPS505 FPS
ultra488 FPS444 FPS
1440p
low488 FPS505 FPS
medium488 FPS459 FPS
high485 FPS416 FPS
ultra434 FPS359 FPS
4K
low442 FPS412 FPS
medium389 FPS320 FPS
high337 FPS283 FPS
ultra274 FPS227 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore i5-12400FRyzen Embedded V3C48
1080p
low488 FPS505 FPS
medium488 FPS505 FPS
high488 FPS505 FPS
ultra488 FPS505 FPS
1440p
low488 FPS505 FPS
medium488 FPS505 FPS
high488 FPS505 FPS
ultra473 FPS461 FPS
4K
low488 FPS486 FPS
medium450 FPS435 FPS
high391 FPS391 FPS
ultra330 FPS339 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-12400F and Ryzen Embedded V3C48

Intel

Core i5-12400F

The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.

AMD

Ryzen Embedded V3C48

The Ryzen Embedded V3C48 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt (2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 20,203 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The Core i5-12400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen Embedded V3C48 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen Embedded V3C48 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F versus 3.8 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded V3C48 — a 14.6% clock advantage for the Core i5-12400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i5-12400F uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen Embedded V3C48 uses Rembrandt (2022) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12400F scores 19,532 against the Ryzen Embedded V3C48's 20,203 — a 3.4% lead for the Ryzen Embedded V3C48. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded V3C48.

FeatureCore i5-12400FRyzen Embedded V3C48
Cores / Threads
6 / 12
8 / 16+33%
Boost Clock
4.4 GHz+16%
3.8 GHz
Base Clock
2.5 GHz
3.3 GHz+32%
L3 Cache
18 MB (total)+13%
16 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)+150%
512 kB (per core)
Process
Intel 7 nm
6 nm-14%
Architecture
Alder Lake-S (2022)
Rembrandt (2022)
PassMark
19,532
20,203+3%
Cinebench R23 Multi
12,380
Geekbench 6 Single
1,700
Geekbench 6 Multi
657
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-12400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen Embedded V3C48 uses FP7 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i5-12400FRyzen Embedded V3C48
Socket
LGA1700
FP7
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F) / not specified (Ryzen Embedded V3C48). Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600.

FeatureCore i5-12400FRyzen Embedded V3C48
Integrated GPU
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Gaming Performance/Value