PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-12400F

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $825 less on MSRP ($174 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 308.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 112.3 vs 27.5 PassMark/$ ($174 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 180W, a 115W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of SP3r2 and DDR4.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (657 vs 9,000).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +21.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+77.8% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 18 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅220% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 27.5 vs 112.3 PassMark/$ ($999 MSRP vs $174 MSRP).
❌176.9% higher power demand at 180W vs 65W.
❌Older platform position on SP3r2 with DDR4, while Core i5-12400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.

Core i5-12400F

2022

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X

2017

Why buy it

✅Costs $825 less on MSRP ($174 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 308.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 112.3 vs 27.5 PassMark/$ ($174 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 180W, a 115W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of SP3r2 and DDR4.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +21.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+77.8% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 18 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅220% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (657 vs 9,000).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 27.5 vs 112.3 PassMark/$ ($999 MSRP vs $174 MSRP).
❌176.9% higher power demand at 180W vs 65W.
❌Older platform position on SP3r2 with DDR4, while Core i5-12400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Threadripper 1950X better than Core i5-12400F?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Ryzen Threadripper 1950X makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-12400F is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 21.5% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is the better fit. You are getting 1269.9% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 77.8% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 18 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-12400F makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is 474.1% more expensive on MSRP at $999 MSRP versus $174 MSRP, and it gives you a 21.5% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-12400F is also 308.0% better value on MSRP (112.3 vs 27.5 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-12400F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2017) and a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of SP3r2. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-12400F Benchmark Check

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-12400F	Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
1080p
low	183 FPS	198 FPS
medium	168 FPS	172 FPS
high	139 FPS	141 FPS
ultra	119 FPS	110 FPS
1440p
low	153 FPS	155 FPS
medium	132 FPS	129 FPS
high	106 FPS	103 FPS
ultra	89 FPS	80 FPS
4K
low	87 FPS	69 FPS
medium	81 FPS	61 FPS
high	64 FPS	48 FPS
ultra	49 FPS	37 FPS

Open Core i5-12400F Open Ryzen Threadripper 1950X

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-12400F	Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
1080p
low	471 FPS	407 FPS
medium	397 FPS	365 FPS
high	341 FPS	311 FPS
ultra	301 FPS	259 FPS
1440p
low	407 FPS	348 FPS
medium	351 FPS	318 FPS
high	309 FPS	272 FPS
ultra	265 FPS	224 FPS
4K
low	282 FPS	224 FPS
medium	248 FPS	204 FPS
high	229 FPS	185 FPS
ultra	196 FPS	150 FPS

Open Core i5-12400F Open Ryzen Threadripper 1950X

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-12400F	Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
1080p
low	488 FPS	687 FPS
medium	488 FPS	687 FPS
high	488 FPS	687 FPS
ultra	488 FPS	687 FPS
1440p
low	488 FPS	687 FPS
medium	488 FPS	687 FPS
high	485 FPS	656 FPS
ultra	434 FPS	584 FPS
4K
low	442 FPS	519 FPS
medium	389 FPS	428 FPS
high	337 FPS	383 FPS
ultra	274 FPS	321 FPS

Open Core i5-12400F Open Ryzen Threadripper 1950X

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-12400F	Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
1080p
low	488 FPS	687 FPS
medium	488 FPS	687 FPS
high	488 FPS	687 FPS
ultra	488 FPS	640 FPS
1440p
low	488 FPS	687 FPS
medium	488 FPS	687 FPS
high	488 FPS	611 FPS
ultra	473 FPS	510 FPS
4K
low	488 FPS	578 FPS
medium	450 FPS	517 FPS
high	391 FPS	458 FPS
ultra	330 FPS	382 FPS

Open Core i5-12400F Open Ryzen Threadripper 1950X

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-12400F and Ryzen Threadripper 1950X

Core i5-12400F

The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X

The Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 27,487 points. Launch price was $999.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-12400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F versus 4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X — a 9.5% clock advantage for the Core i5-12400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core i5-12400F uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12400F scores 19,532 against the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X's 27,487 — a 33.8% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,700 vs 1,040, a 48.2% lead for the Core i5-12400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 657 vs 9,000 (172.8% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X). L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F vs 32 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.

Feature	Core i5-12400F	Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	16 / 32+167%
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz+10%	4 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	3.4 GHz+36%
L3 Cache	18 MB (total)	32 MB+78%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+150%	512K (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Alder Lake-S (2022)	Zen (2017−2020)
PassMark	19,532	27,487+41%
Cinebench R23 Multi	12,380	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,700+63%	1,040
Geekbench 6 Multi	657	9,000+1270%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-12400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X uses SP3r2 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-12400F versus DDR4-2666 on the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X — the Core i5-12400F supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper 1950X supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-12400F) vs 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 1950X). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-12400F) vs 64 (Ryzen Threadripper 1950X) — the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X offers 44 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-12400F) and X399 (Ryzen Threadripper 1950X).

Feature	Core i5-12400F	Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Socket	LGA1700	SP3r2
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+25%	DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	256 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	64+220%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F) vs AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper 1950X). Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value, Ryzen Threadripper 1950X targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600.

Feature	Core i5-12400F	Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	—	Yes
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	AMD-V
Target Use	Gaming Performance/Value	Workstation

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-12400F launched at $174 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X debuted at $999. On MSRP ($174 vs $999), the Core i5-12400F is $825 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-12400F delivers 112.3 pts/$ vs 27.5 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X — making the Core i5-12400F the 121.3% better value option.