Core i5-12400F vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX

CPU

GPU

Core i5-12400F

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2022

Core family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX

16 Cores32 Thrd280 WWMax: 4.5 GHz2022

Threadripper Pro family

···

Buy on Amazon

Core i5-12400F vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX Performance Spectrum

Core i5-12400F

6 / 12

19,532

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX

16 / 32

48,756

+149.6%

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-12400F vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-12400F vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-12400F

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $625 less on MSRP ($174 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
✅Delivers 84.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 112.3 vs 61.0 PassMark/$ ($174 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 280W, a 215W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of sWRX8 and DDR4.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (19,532 vs 48,756).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +44.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+255.6% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 18 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 61.0 vs 112.3 PassMark/$ ($799 MSRP vs $174 MSRP).
❌330.8% higher power demand at 280W vs 65W.
❌Older platform position on sWRX8 with DDR4, while Core i5-12400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX better than Core i5-12400F?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-12400F is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 44.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX is the stronger fit. You are getting 149.6% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 255.6% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 18 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-12400F is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX comes in 359.2% more expensive on MSRP at $799 MSRP versus $174 MSRP, and it still gives you a 44.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-12400F is also 84.0% better value on MSRP (112.3 vs 61.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i5-12400F vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-12400F

The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 8 March 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Chagall PRO (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 48,756 points. Launch price was $499.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-12400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX — a 2.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX (base: 2.5 GHz vs 4 GHz). The Core i5-12400F uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX uses Chagall PRO (2022) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12400F scores 19,532 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX's 48,756 — a 85.6% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F vs 64 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX.

Feature	Core i5-12400F	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	16 / 32+167%
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz	4.5 GHz+2%
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	4 GHz+60%
L3 Cache	18 MB (total)	64 MB+256%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	512K (per core)+40860%
Process	Intel 7 nm	7 nm
Architecture	Alder Lake-S (2022)	Chagall PRO (2022)
PassMark	19,532	48,756+150%
Cinebench R23 Multi	12,380	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,700	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	657	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-12400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX uses sWRX8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-12400F versus 3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX — the Core i5-12400F supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-12400F) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-12400F) vs 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-12400F) and WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX).

Feature	Core i5-12400F	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX
Socket	LGA1700	sWRX8
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+50%	3200
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	2048 GB+1500%
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	128+540%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX). Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX rivals Xeon w5-3335.

Feature	Core i5-12400F	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	—	None
Unlocked	—	Yes
AVX-512	—	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V
Target Use	Gaming Performance/Value	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-12400F was priced at $174, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX came in at $799. On launch pricing ($174 vs $799), Core i5-12400F was $625 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-12400F delivers 112.3 pts/$ vs 61.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX — making the Core i5-12400F the 59.1% better value option.

Feature	Core i5-12400F	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX
MSRP	$174-78%	$799
Performance per Dollar	112.3+84%	61.0
Release Date	2022	2022

Search Core i5-12400F on Amazon

Search Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.