Core i5-12400F vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX

CPU

GPU

Core i5-12400F

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2022

Core family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX

16 Cores32 Thrd350 WWMax: 5.4 GHz2025

Buy on Amazon

Core i5-12400F vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX Performance Spectrum

Core i5-12400F

6 / 12

19,532

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX

16 / 32

67,561

+245.9%

Ryzen 7 9700X

Ryzen 9 7845HX

Ryzen 9 9850HX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-12400F vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-12400F vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-12400F

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $255 less on MSRP ($174 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 350W, a 285W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (12,380 vs 40,000).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 112.3 vs 157.5 PassMark/$ ($174 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +34.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+255.6% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 18 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅Delivers 40.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 157.5 vs 112.3 PassMark/$ ($429 MSRP vs $174 MSRP).
✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌
146.6% HIGHER MSRP
$429 MSRPvs$174 MSRP
❌438.5% higher power demand at 350W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX better than Core i5-12400F?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-12400F is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 34.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX is the stronger fit. You are getting 223.1% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 255.6% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 18 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX is the better buy right now. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX comes in 146.6% more expensive on MSRP at $429 MSRP versus $174 MSRP, and it still gives you a 34.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 40.3% better value on MSRP (157.5 vs 112.3 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2022), 255.6% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 18 MB), more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 6/12, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i5-12400F vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-12400F

The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 July 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Shimada Peak (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 67,561 points. Launch price was $1,649.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-12400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F versus 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX — a 20.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX (base: 2.5 GHz vs 4.5 GHz). The Core i5-12400F uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX uses Shimada Peak (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12400F scores 19,532 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX's 67,561 — a 110.3% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 12,380 vs 40,000 (105.5% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,700 vs 3,016, a 55.8% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 657 vs 23,596 (189.2% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX). L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F vs 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX.

Feature	Core i5-12400F	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	16 / 32+167%
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz	5.4 GHz+23%
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	4.5 GHz+80%
L3 Cache	18 MB (total)	64 MB (total)+256%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+25%	1 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	4 nm-43%
Architecture	Alder Lake-S (2022)	Shimada Peak (2025)
PassMark	19,532	67,561+246%
Cinebench R23 Multi	12,380	40,000+223%
Geekbench 6 Single	1,700	3,016+77%
Geekbench 6 Multi	657	23,596+3491%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-12400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX uses sTR5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-12400F versus DDR5-6400 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-12400F) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-12400F) vs 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-12400F) and WRX90 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX).

Feature	Core i5-12400F	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
Socket	LGA1700	sTR5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200	DDR5-6400+33%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	2048 GB+1500%
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	128+540%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX). Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX rivals Xeon w7-3555.

Feature	Core i5-12400F	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	—	None
Unlocked	—	Yes
AVX-512	—	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	true
Target Use	Gaming Performance/Value	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-12400F was priced at $174, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX came in at $429. On launch pricing ($174 vs $429), Core i5-12400F was $255 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-12400F delivers 112.3 pts/$ vs 157.5 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX the 33.5% better value option.

Feature	Core i5-12400F	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
MSRP	$174-59%	$429
Performance per Dollar	112.3	157.5+40%
Release Date	2022	2025

Search Core i5-12400F on Amazon

Search Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.