
Core i5-12400F
Popular choices:

Ryzen Z2
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-12400F
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +46.1% higher average FPS across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen Z2.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $174 MSRP, while Ryzen Z2 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌712.5% higher power demand at 65W vs 8W.
Ryzen Z2
2025Why buy it
- ✅Draws 8W instead of 65W, a 57W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12400F across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (10,106 vs 19,532).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Core i5-12400F
2022Ryzen Z2
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +46.1% higher average FPS across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen Z2.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 8W instead of 65W, a 57W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $174 MSRP, while Ryzen Z2 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌712.5% higher power demand at 65W vs 8W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12400F across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (10,106 vs 19,532).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-12400F better than Ryzen Z2?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen Z2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 253 FPS |
| medium | 168 FPS | 238 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 201 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 229 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 191 FPS |
| high | 106 FPS | 155 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 137 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 92 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen Z2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 471 FPS | 253 FPS |
| medium | 397 FPS | 253 FPS |
| high | 341 FPS | 253 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 253 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 407 FPS | 253 FPS |
| medium | 351 FPS | 253 FPS |
| high | 309 FPS | 253 FPS |
| ultra | 265 FPS | 253 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 282 FPS | 253 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 253 FPS |
| high | 229 FPS | 248 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 214 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen Z2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 253 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 253 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 253 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 253 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 253 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 253 FPS |
| high | 485 FPS | 253 FPS |
| ultra | 434 FPS | 253 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 253 FPS |
| medium | 389 FPS | 253 FPS |
| high | 337 FPS | 253 FPS |
| ultra | 274 FPS | 253 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen Z2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 253 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 253 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 253 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 253 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 253 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 253 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 253 FPS |
| ultra | 473 FPS | 253 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 253 FPS |
| medium | 450 FPS | 253 FPS |
| high | 391 FPS | 253 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 253 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-12400F and Ryzen Z2

Core i5-12400F
Core i5-12400F
The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.


Ryzen Z2
Ryzen Z2
The Ryzen Z2 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP7r2/FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 8 MB + 16 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 10,106 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core i5-12400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen Z2 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen Z2 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen Z2 — a 14.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen Z2 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i5-12400F uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen Z2 uses Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12400F scores 19,532 against the Ryzen Z2's 10,106 — a 63.6% lead for the Core i5-12400F. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F vs 16 MB on the Ryzen Z2.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen Z2 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 5.1 GHz+16% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.3 GHz+32% |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total)+13% | 16 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 8 MB+540% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-S (2022) | Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025) |
| PassMark | 19,532+93% | 10,106 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 12,380 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,700 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 657 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-12400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen Z2 uses FP7/FP7r2/FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen Z2 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FP7/FP7r2/FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F) / not specified (Ryzen Z2). Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen Z2 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Gaming Performance/Value | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











