Core i5-12400F vs Steam Deck OLED APU

Intel

Core i5-12400F

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2022

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Steam Deck OLED APU

4 Cores8 Thrd2 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2023

Popular choices:

i5-12400F

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-12400F

2022

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +117.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +350% larger total L3 cache (18 MB vs 4 MB).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Steam Deck OLED APU.

Trade-offs

  • Launch MSRP is still $174 MSRP, while Steam Deck OLED APU mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 3150% higher power demand at 65W vs 2W.

Steam Deck OLED APU

2023

Why buy it

  • Draws 2W instead of 65W, a 63W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (4,457 vs 19,532).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 18 MB).
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-12400F better than Steam Deck OLED APU?
Yes. Core i5-12400F is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 117.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 338.2% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i5-12400F is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 117.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-12400F is the better fit. You are getting 338.2% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 350% larger total L3 cache (18 MB vs 4 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i5-12400F is the smarter buy today. Core i5-12400F is at an unclear MSRP at $174 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 117.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (112.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-12400F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of the older platform, 350% larger total L3 cache (18 MB vs 4 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore i5-12400FSteam Deck OLED APU
1080p
low183 FPS111 FPS
medium168 FPS111 FPS
high139 FPS107 FPS
ultra119 FPS83 FPS
1440p
low153 FPS111 FPS
medium132 FPS109 FPS
high106 FPS86 FPS
ultra89 FPS67 FPS
4K
low87 FPS66 FPS
medium81 FPS55 FPS
high64 FPS43 FPS
ultra49 FPS34 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore i5-12400FSteam Deck OLED APU
1080p
low471 FPS111 FPS
medium397 FPS111 FPS
high341 FPS111 FPS
ultra301 FPS111 FPS
1440p
low407 FPS111 FPS
medium351 FPS111 FPS
high309 FPS111 FPS
ultra265 FPS104 FPS
4K
low282 FPS111 FPS
medium248 FPS111 FPS
high229 FPS86 FPS
ultra196 FPS64 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore i5-12400FSteam Deck OLED APU
1080p
low488 FPS111 FPS
medium488 FPS111 FPS
high488 FPS111 FPS
ultra488 FPS111 FPS
1440p
low488 FPS111 FPS
medium488 FPS111 FPS
high485 FPS111 FPS
ultra434 FPS111 FPS
4K
low442 FPS111 FPS
medium389 FPS111 FPS
high337 FPS111 FPS
ultra274 FPS111 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore i5-12400FSteam Deck OLED APU
1080p
low488 FPS111 FPS
medium488 FPS111 FPS
high488 FPS111 FPS
ultra488 FPS111 FPS
1440p
low488 FPS111 FPS
medium488 FPS111 FPS
high488 FPS111 FPS
ultra473 FPS111 FPS
4K
low488 FPS111 FPS
medium450 FPS111 FPS
high391 FPS111 FPS
ultra330 FPS111 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-12400F and Steam Deck OLED APU

Intel

Core i5-12400F

The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.

AMD

Steam Deck OLED APU

The Steam Deck OLED APU is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 9 November 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Van Gogh (Custom) (2023) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 6 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB + 4 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,457 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Core i5-12400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Steam Deck OLED APU offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i5-12400F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F versus 3.5 GHz on the Steam Deck OLED APU — a 22.8% clock advantage for the Core i5-12400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i5-12400F uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Steam Deck OLED APU uses Van Gogh (Custom) (2023) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12400F scores 19,532 against the Steam Deck OLED APU's 4,457 — a 125.7% lead for the Core i5-12400F. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F vs 4 MB on the Steam Deck OLED APU.

FeatureCore i5-12400FSteam Deck OLED APU
Cores / Threads
6 / 12+50%
4 / 8
Boost Clock
4.4 GHz+26%
3.5 GHz
Base Clock
2.5 GHz+4%
2.4 GHz
L3 Cache
18 MB (total)+350%
4 MB
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)
2 MB+60%
Process
Intel 7 nm
6 nm-14%
Architecture
Alder Lake-S (2022)
Van Gogh (Custom) (2023)
PassMark
19,532+338%
4,457
Cinebench R23 Multi
12,380
Geekbench 6 Single
1,700
Geekbench 6 Multi
657
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F) / not specified (Steam Deck OLED APU). Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600.

FeatureCore i5-12400FSteam Deck OLED APU
Integrated GPU
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Gaming Performance/Value