
Core i5-12400F

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86
Core i5-12400F vs Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-12400F vs Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-12400F vs Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-12400F
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +334.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of S1g2 and older memory support.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $174 MSRP, while Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌3150% higher power demand at 65W vs 2W.
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86
2008Why buy it
- ✅Draws 2W instead of 65W, a 63W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,965 vs 19,532).
- ❌Older platform position on S1g2, while Core i5-12400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-12400F better than Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-12400F vs Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-12400F
The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86
The Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Griffin (2008−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: S1g2. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,965 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Core i5-12400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Core i5-12400F has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F versus 2.4 GHz on the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 — a 58.8% clock advantage for the Core i5-12400F. The Core i5-12400F uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 uses Griffin (2008−2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12400F scores 19,532 against the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86's 1,965 — a 163.4% lead for the Core i5-12400F. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F vs 0 kB on the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12+200% | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+83% | 2.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total) | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 2 MB+60% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-89% | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-S (2022) | Griffin (2008−2009) |
| PassMark | 19,532+894% | 1,965 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 12,380 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,700 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 657 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-12400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 uses S1g2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-12400F versus DDR2-800 on the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 — the Core i5-12400F supports 500% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-12400F supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 3100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-12400F) vs 0 (Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86) — the Core i5-12400F offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | S1g2 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+500% | DDR2-800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+3100% | 4 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F) vs AMD-V (Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86). Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value, Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 targets Mobile. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Gaming Performance/Value | Mobile |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














