
Core i5-12400F

Xeon 6325P
Core i5-12400F vs Xeon 6325P Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-12400F vs Xeon 6325P FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-12400F vs Xeon 6325P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-12400F
2022Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +8.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β +50% larger total L3 cache (18 MB vs 12 MB).
- β Costs $107 less on MSRP ($174 MSRP vs $281 MSRP).
- β Delivers 93.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 112.3 vs 58.2 PassMark/$ ($174 MSRP vs $281 MSRP).
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- β18.2% higher power demand at 65W vs 55W.
Xeon 6325P
2025Why buy it
- β Draws 55W instead of 65W, a 10W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (16,346 vs 19,532).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 18 MB).
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 58.2 vs 112.3 PassMark/$ ($281 MSRP vs $174 MSRP).
- βNo boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-12400F better than Xeon 6325P?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-12400F vs Xeon 6325P Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-12400F
The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.

Xeon 6325P
The Xeon 6325P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023β2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 16,346 points. Launch price was $281.
Processing Power
The Core i5-12400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon 6325P offers 4 cores / 8 threads β the Core i5-12400F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon 6325P β a 8.7% clock advantage for the Xeon 6325P (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i5-12400F uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon 6325P uses Raptor Lake-R (2023β2025) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12400F scores 19,532 against the Xeon 6325P's 16,346 β a 17.8% lead for the Core i5-12400F. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon 6325P.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Xeon 6325P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12+50% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 4.8 GHz+9% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.5 GHz+40% |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total)+50% | 12 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-S (2022) | Raptor Lake-R (2023β2025) |
| PassMark | 19,532+19% | 16,346 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 12,380 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,700 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 657 | β |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA1700 socket with PCIe 3.0.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Xeon 6325P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | β |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | β |
| RAM Channels | 2 | β |
| ECC Support | No | β |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | β |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F) / not specified (Xeon 6325P). Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Xeon 6325P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | β |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | β |
| Target Use | Gaming Performance/Value | β |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-12400F was priced at $174, while the Xeon 6325P came in at $281. On launch pricing ($174 vs $281), Core i5-12400F was $107 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-12400F delivers 112.3 pts/$ vs 58.2 pts/$ for the Xeon 6325P β making the Core i5-12400F the 63.5% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Xeon 6325P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $174-38% | $281 |
| Performance per Dollar | 112.3+93% | 58.2 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2025 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














