
Core i5-12400F

Xeon 6357P
Core i5-12400F vs Xeon 6357P Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-12400F vs Xeon 6357P FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-12400F vs Xeon 6357P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-12400F
2022Why buy it
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 80W, a 15W reduction.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon 6357P.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon 6357P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (12,380 vs 18,000).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon 6357P, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $174 MSRP, while Xeon 6357P mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon 6357P
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 18 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌23.1% higher power demand at 80W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon 6357P better than Core i5-12400F?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-12400F vs Xeon 6357P Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-12400F
The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.

Xeon 6357P
The Xeon 6357P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 30,401 points. Launch price was $556.
Processing Power
The Core i5-12400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon 6357P offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon 6357P has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F versus 5.1 GHz on the Xeon 6357P — a 14.7% clock advantage for the Xeon 6357P (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i5-12400F uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon 6357P uses Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12400F scores 19,532 against the Xeon 6357P's 30,401 — a 43.5% lead for the Xeon 6357P. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 12,380 vs 18,000 (37% advantage for the Xeon 6357P). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,700 vs 2,784, a 48.3% lead for the Xeon 6357P that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 657 vs 12,769 (180.4% advantage for the Xeon 6357P). L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F vs 24 MB (total) on the Xeon 6357P.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Xeon 6357P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 5.1 GHz+16% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3 GHz+20% |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total) | 24 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+60% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-S (2022) | Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) |
| PassMark | 19,532 | 30,401+56% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 12,380 | 18,000+45% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,700 | 2,784+64% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 657 | 12,769+1844% |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA1700 socket with PCIe 3.0. Both support up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 memory speed. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-12400F) and Server chipsets (Xeon 6357P).
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Xeon 6357P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | DDR5-4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Both support VT-x, VT-d, EPT virtualization. Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value, Xeon 6357P targets Edge Server / Workstation. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600; Xeon 6357P rivals Core i7-14700.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Xeon 6357P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Gaming Performance/Value | Edge Server / Workstation |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













