PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-12400F vs Xeon 6747P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-12400F vs Xeon 6747P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-12400F

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $6,323 less on MSRP ($174 MSRP vs $6,497 MSRP).
✅Delivers 617.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 112.3 vs 15.7 PassMark/$ ($174 MSRP vs $6,497 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 330W, a 265W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon 6747P.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon 6747P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (657 vs 45,000).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon 6747P, which brings 48 cores / 96 threads and 88 PCIe lanes.

Xeon 6747P

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 48 cores / 96 threads, plus 88 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅340% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.7 vs 112.3 PassMark/$ ($6,497 MSRP vs $174 MSRP).
❌407.7% higher power demand at 330W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon 6747P better than Core i5-12400F?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon 6747P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-12400F is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon 6747P is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 7.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests. It also has a clear cache advantage at 288 MB versus 18 MB.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon 6747P is the stronger fit. You are getting 6749.3% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 48 cores and 96 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 1500% larger total L3 cache (288 MB vs 18 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon 6747P is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-12400F is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon 6747P comes in 3633.9% more expensive on MSRP at $6,497 MSRP versus $174 MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-12400F is also 617.2% better value on MSRP (112.3 vs 15.7 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon 6747P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2022), 3D V-Cache and a much larger 288 MB L3 cache instead of 18 MB, more multi-core headroom with 48 cores / 96 threads instead of 6/12, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i5-12400F vs Xeon 6747P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-12400F

The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.

Xeon 6747P

The Xeon 6747P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 288 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 330 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s), MRDIMM(8800MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 101,685 points. Launch price was $6,497.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-12400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon 6747P offers 48 cores / 96 threads — the Xeon 6747P has 42 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon 6747P — a 12% clock advantage for the Core i5-12400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Core i5-12400F uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon 6747P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12400F scores 19,532 against the Xeon 6747P's 101,685 — a 135.5% lead for the Xeon 6747P. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,700 vs 2,000, a 16.2% lead for the Xeon 6747P that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 657 vs 45,000 (194.2% advantage for the Xeon 6747P). L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F vs 288 MB (total) on the Xeon 6747P.

Feature	Core i5-12400F	Xeon 6747P
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	48 / 96+700%
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz+13%	3.9 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	2.7 GHz+8%
L3 Cache	18 MB (total)	288 MB (total)+1500%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+60%
Process	Intel 7 nm	Intel 3 nm-57%
Architecture	Alder Lake-S (2022)	Granite Rapids (2024−2025)
PassMark	19,532	101,685+421%
Cinebench R23 Multi	12,380	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,700	2,000+18%
Geekbench 6 Multi	657	45,000+6749%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-12400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon 6747P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-12400F versus DDR5-6400 on the Xeon 6747P — the Xeon 6747P supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon 6747P supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 3100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-12400F) vs 8 (Xeon 6747P). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-12400F) vs 88 (Xeon 6747P) — the Xeon 6747P offers 68 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-12400F) and C741 (Xeon 6747P).

Feature	Core i5-12400F	Xeon 6747P
Socket	LGA1700	LGA4710
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200	DDR5-6400+33%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	4096 GB+3100%
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	88+340%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon 6747P). Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value, Xeon 6747P targets High Performance Server. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600; Xeon 6747P rivals EPYC 9555.

Feature	Core i5-12400F	Xeon 6747P
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	—	None
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Gaming Performance/Value	High Performance Server

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-12400F was priced at $174, while the Xeon 6747P came in at $6497. On launch pricing ($174 vs $6497), Core i5-12400F was $6323 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-12400F delivers 112.3 pts/$ vs 15.7 pts/$ for the Xeon 6747P — making the Core i5-12400F the 151.1% better value option.

Feature	Core i5-12400F	Xeon 6747P
MSRP	$174-97%	$6497
Performance per Dollar	112.3+615%	15.7
Release Date	2022	2025

Search Core i5-12400F on Amazon

Search Xeon 6747P on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.