
Core i5-12400F
Popular choices:

Xeon E-2456
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-12400F
2022Why buy it
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 80W, a 15W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon E-2456.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E-2456 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,532 vs 20,705).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $174 MSRP, while Xeon E-2456 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon E-2456
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌23.1% higher power demand at 80W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Core i5-12400F
2022Xeon E-2456
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 80W, a 15W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon E-2456.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E-2456 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,532 vs 20,705).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $174 MSRP, while Xeon E-2456 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌23.1% higher power demand at 80W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon E-2456 better than Core i5-12400F?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Xeon E-2456 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 267 FPS |
| medium | 168 FPS | 253 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 214 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 183 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 235 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 199 FPS |
| high | 106 FPS | 162 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 142 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 95 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Xeon E-2456 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 471 FPS | 518 FPS |
| medium | 397 FPS | 483 FPS |
| high | 341 FPS | 408 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 364 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 407 FPS | 493 FPS |
| medium | 351 FPS | 428 FPS |
| high | 309 FPS | 364 FPS |
| ultra | 265 FPS | 313 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 282 FPS | 312 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 279 FPS |
| high | 229 FPS | 259 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 222 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Xeon E-2456 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 518 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 518 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 518 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 518 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 518 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 518 FPS |
| high | 485 FPS | 518 FPS |
| ultra | 434 FPS | 469 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 502 FPS |
| medium | 389 FPS | 448 FPS |
| high | 337 FPS | 391 FPS |
| ultra | 274 FPS | 327 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Xeon E-2456 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 518 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 518 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 518 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 518 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 518 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 518 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 518 FPS |
| ultra | 473 FPS | 518 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 518 FPS |
| medium | 450 FPS | 492 FPS |
| high | 391 FPS | 432 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 364 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-12400F and Xeon E-2456

Core i5-12400F
Core i5-12400F
The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.

Xeon E-2456
Xeon E-2456
The Xeon E-2456 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 20,705 points. Launch price was $375.
Processing Power
Both the Core i5-12400F and Xeon E-2456 share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F versus 5.1 GHz on the Xeon E-2456 — a 14.7% clock advantage for the Xeon E-2456 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i5-12400F uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon E-2456 uses Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12400F scores 19,532 against the Xeon E-2456's 20,705 — a 5.8% lead for the Xeon E-2456. Both processors carry 18 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Xeon E-2456 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 5.1 GHz+16% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.3 GHz+32% |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total) | 18 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-S (2022) | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 19,532 | 20,705+6% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 12,380 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,700 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 657 | — |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA1700 socket with PCIe 3.0.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Xeon E-2456 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F) / not specified (Xeon E-2456). Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Xeon E-2456 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Gaming Performance/Value | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












