
Core i5-12400F
Popular choices:

Xeon E3-1245 v6
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-12400F
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +96.4% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+125% larger total L3 cache (18 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 73W, a 8W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $174 MSRP, while Xeon E3-1245 v6 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon E3-1245 v6
2017Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12400F across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (8,711 vs 19,532).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 18 MB).
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1151 with DDR4, while Core i5-12400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Core i5-12400F
2022Xeon E3-1245 v6
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +96.4% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+125% larger total L3 cache (18 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 73W, a 8W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $174 MSRP, while Xeon E3-1245 v6 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12400F across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (8,711 vs 19,532).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 18 MB).
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1151 with DDR4, while Core i5-12400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-12400F better than Xeon E3-1245 v6?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Xeon E3-1245 v6 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 168 FPS | 158 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 127 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 106 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 74 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Xeon E3-1245 v6 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 471 FPS | 218 FPS |
| medium | 397 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 341 FPS | 197 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 169 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 407 FPS | 218 FPS |
| medium | 351 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 309 FPS | 176 FPS |
| ultra | 265 FPS | 151 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 282 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 158 FPS |
| high | 229 FPS | 134 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 111 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Xeon E3-1245 v6 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 218 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 218 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 218 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 218 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 218 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 218 FPS |
| high | 485 FPS | 218 FPS |
| ultra | 434 FPS | 218 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 218 FPS |
| medium | 389 FPS | 218 FPS |
| high | 337 FPS | 218 FPS |
| ultra | 274 FPS | 218 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Xeon E3-1245 v6 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 218 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 218 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 218 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 218 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 218 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 218 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 218 FPS |
| ultra | 473 FPS | 218 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 218 FPS |
| medium | 450 FPS | 218 FPS |
| high | 391 FPS | 218 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 218 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-12400F and Xeon E3-1245 v6

Core i5-12400F
Core i5-12400F
The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.

Xeon E3-1245 v6
Xeon E3-1245 v6
The Xeon E3-1245 v6 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 28 March 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 73 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400, DDR3L-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 8,711 points. Launch price was $284.
Processing Power
The Core i5-12400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E3-1245 v6 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i5-12400F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F versus 4.1 GHz on the Xeon E3-1245 v6 — a 7.1% clock advantage for the Core i5-12400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Core i5-12400F uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon E3-1245 v6 uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12400F scores 19,532 against the Xeon E3-1245 v6's 8,711 — a 76.6% lead for the Core i5-12400F. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F vs 8 MB on the Xeon E3-1245 v6.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Xeon E3-1245 v6 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12+50% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+7% | 4.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.7 GHz+48% |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total)+125% | 8 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+25% | 1 MB |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-S (2022) | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) |
| PassMark | 19,532+124% | 8,711 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 12,380 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,700 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 657 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-12400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E3-1245 v6 uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Xeon E3-1245 v6 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA1151 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F) / not specified (Xeon E3-1245 v6). Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Xeon E3-1245 v6 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Gaming Performance/Value | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












