
Core i5-12400F

Xeon E5-2660 v4
Core i5-12400F vs Xeon E5-2660 v4 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-12400F vs Xeon E5-2660 v4 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-12400F vs Xeon E5-2660 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-12400F
2022Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +8.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Draws 65W instead of 105W, a 40W reduction.
- β Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- β Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon E5-2660 v4.
Trade-offs
- βSmaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 35 MB).
- βLess compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2660 v4, which brings 14 cores / 28 threads.
- βLaunch MSRP is still $174 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2660 v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon E5-2660 v4
2016Why buy it
- β +94.4% larger total L3 cache (35 MB vs 18 MB).
- β Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 14 cores / 28 threads.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (15,650 vs 19,532).
- β61.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 65W.
- βOlder platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while Core i5-12400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- βNo boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-12400F better than Xeon E5-2660 v4?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-12400F vs Xeon E5-2660 v4 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-12400F
The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.

Xeon E5-2660 v4
The Xeon E5-2660 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015β2019) architecture. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 35 MB. L2 cache: 3.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 15,650 points. Launch price was $1,445.
Processing Power
The Core i5-12400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-2660 v4 offers 14 cores / 28 threads β the Xeon E5-2660 v4 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon E5-2660 v4 β a 31.6% clock advantage for the Core i5-12400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i5-12400F uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon E5-2660 v4 uses Broadwell (2015β2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12400F scores 19,532 against the Xeon E5-2660 v4's 15,650 β a 22.1% lead for the Core i5-12400F. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F vs 35 MB on the Xeon E5-2660 v4.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Xeon E5-2660 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 14 / 28+133% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+38% | 3.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz+25% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total) | 35 MB+94% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 3.5 MB+180% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-S (2022) | Broadwell (2015β2019) |
| PassMark | 19,532+25% | 15,650 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 12,380 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,700 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 657 | β |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-12400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2660 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Xeon E5-2660 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | β |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | β |
| RAM Channels | 2 | β |
| ECC Support | No | β |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | β |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F) / not specified (Xeon E5-2660 v4). Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Xeon E5-2660 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | β |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | β |
| Target Use | Gaming Performance/Value | β |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













