Core i5-12400F vs Xeon Phi 7290

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-12400F

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +26.3% higher average FPS across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 65W instead of 245W, a 180W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon Phi 7290.

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Phi 7290, which brings 72 cores / 288 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $174 MSRP, while Xeon Phi 7290 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon Phi 7290

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 72 cores / 288 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12400F across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (17,839 vs 19,532).
❌276.9% higher power demand at 245W vs 65W.
❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Core i5-12400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.

Core i5-12400F

2022

Xeon Phi 7290

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +26.3% higher average FPS across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 65W instead of 245W, a 180W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon Phi 7290.

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 72 cores / 288 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Phi 7290, which brings 72 cores / 288 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $174 MSRP, while Xeon Phi 7290 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12400F across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (17,839 vs 19,532).
❌276.9% higher power demand at 245W vs 65W.
❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Core i5-12400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-12400F better than Xeon Phi 7290?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon Phi 7290 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-12400F is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-12400F is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 26.3% more average FPS across 5 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-12400F is the better fit. You are getting 9.5% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-12400F is the smarter buy today. Core i5-12400F is at an unclear MSRP at $174 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 26.3% average FPS lead across 5 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (112.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-12400F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2016), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA3647, and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 72/288. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-12400F Benchmark Check

Xeon Phi 7290 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-12400F	Xeon Phi 7290
1080p
low	183 FPS	177 FPS
medium	168 FPS	143 FPS
high	139 FPS	113 FPS
ultra	119 FPS	88 FPS
1440p
low	153 FPS	141 FPS
medium	132 FPS	111 FPS
high	106 FPS	87 FPS
ultra	89 FPS	68 FPS
4K
low	87 FPS	66 FPS
medium	81 FPS	56 FPS
high	64 FPS	43 FPS
ultra	49 FPS	34 FPS

Open Core i5-12400F Open Xeon Phi 7290

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-12400F	Xeon Phi 7290
1080p
low	471 FPS	136 FPS
medium	397 FPS	120 FPS
high	341 FPS	109 FPS
ultra	301 FPS	86 FPS
1440p
low	407 FPS	120 FPS
medium	351 FPS	108 FPS
high	309 FPS	97 FPS
ultra	265 FPS	77 FPS
4K
low	282 FPS	87 FPS
medium	248 FPS	81 FPS
high	229 FPS	72 FPS
ultra	196 FPS	56 FPS

Open Core i5-12400F Open Xeon Phi 7290

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-12400F	Xeon Phi 7290
1080p
low	488 FPS	446 FPS
medium	488 FPS	446 FPS
high	488 FPS	446 FPS
ultra	488 FPS	446 FPS
1440p
low	488 FPS	446 FPS
medium	488 FPS	434 FPS
high	485 FPS	374 FPS
ultra	434 FPS	326 FPS
4K
low	442 FPS	394 FPS
medium	389 FPS	306 FPS
high	337 FPS	259 FPS
ultra	274 FPS	209 FPS

Open Core i5-12400F Open Xeon Phi 7290

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-12400F	Xeon Phi 7290
1080p
low	488 FPS	446 FPS
medium	488 FPS	446 FPS
high	488 FPS	446 FPS
ultra	488 FPS	446 FPS
1440p
low	488 FPS	446 FPS
medium	488 FPS	446 FPS
high	488 FPS	446 FPS
ultra	473 FPS	420 FPS
4K
low	488 FPS	446 FPS
medium	450 FPS	405 FPS
high	391 FPS	361 FPS
ultra	330 FPS	310 FPS

Open Core i5-12400F Open Xeon Phi 7290

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-12400F and Xeon Phi 7290

Core i5-12400F

The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.

Xeon Phi 7290

The Xeon Phi 7290 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Knights Landing (2016) architecture. It features 72 cores and 288 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 245 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 17,839 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-12400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon Phi 7290 offers 72 cores / 288 threads — the Xeon Phi 7290 has 66 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F versus 1.7 GHz on the Xeon Phi 7290 — a 88.5% clock advantage for the Core i5-12400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 1.5 GHz). The Core i5-12400F uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon Phi 7290 uses Knights Landing (2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12400F scores 19,532 against the Xeon Phi 7290's 17,839 — a 9.1% lead for the Core i5-12400F. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F vs 0 kB (total) on the Xeon Phi 7290.

Feature	Core i5-12400F	Xeon Phi 7290
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	72 / 288+1100%
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz+159%	1.7 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz+67%	1.5 GHz
L3 Cache	18 MB (total)	0 kB (total)
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+150%	512 kB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Alder Lake-S (2022)	Knights Landing (2016)
PassMark	19,532+9%	17,839
Cinebench R23 Multi	12,380	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,700	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	657	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-12400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Phi 7290 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-12400F	Xeon Phi 7290
Socket	LGA1700	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F) / not specified (Xeon Phi 7290). Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600.