
Core i5-12400F
Popular choices:

Xeon Silver 4514Y
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-12400F
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +15.5% higher average FPS across 28 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 150W, a 85W reduction.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon Silver 4514Y.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (12,380 vs 22,000).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 30 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Silver 4514Y, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 80 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $174 MSRP, while Xeon Silver 4514Y mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon Silver 4514Y
2023Why buy it
- ✅+77.7% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅+66.7% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 18 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 80 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- ✅300% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12400F across 28 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌130.8% higher power demand at 150W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Core i5-12400F
2022Xeon Silver 4514Y
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +15.5% higher average FPS across 28 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 150W, a 85W reduction.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon Silver 4514Y.
Why buy it
- ✅+77.7% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅+66.7% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 18 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 80 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- ✅300% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (12,380 vs 22,000).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 30 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Silver 4514Y, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 80 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $174 MSRP, while Xeon Silver 4514Y mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12400F across 28 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌130.8% higher power demand at 150W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-12400F better than Xeon Silver 4514Y?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Xeon Silver 4514Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 165 FPS |
| medium | 168 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 114 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 136 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 106 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Xeon Silver 4514Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 471 FPS | 217 FPS |
| medium | 397 FPS | 194 FPS |
| high | 341 FPS | 164 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 407 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 351 FPS | 169 FPS |
| high | 309 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 265 FPS | 118 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 282 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 229 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 78 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Xeon Silver 4514Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 766 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 694 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 662 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 587 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 686 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 604 FPS |
| high | 485 FPS | 573 FPS |
| ultra | 434 FPS | 510 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 464 FPS |
| medium | 389 FPS | 376 FPS |
| high | 337 FPS | 342 FPS |
| ultra | 274 FPS | 283 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Xeon Silver 4514Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 766 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 751 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 648 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 553 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 691 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 606 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 521 FPS |
| ultra | 473 FPS | 441 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 478 FPS |
| medium | 450 FPS | 434 FPS |
| high | 391 FPS | 388 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 334 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-12400F and Xeon Silver 4514Y

Core i5-12400F
Core i5-12400F
The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.

Xeon Silver 4514Y
Xeon Silver 4514Y
The Xeon Silver 4514Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 30,621 points. Launch price was $780.
Processing Power
The Core i5-12400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon Silver 4514Y offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon Silver 4514Y has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4514Y — a 25.6% clock advantage for the Core i5-12400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i5-12400F uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4514Y uses Emerald Rapids (2023) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12400F scores 19,532 against the Xeon Silver 4514Y's 30,621 — a 44.2% lead for the Xeon Silver 4514Y. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 12,380 vs 22,000 (56% advantage for the Xeon Silver 4514Y). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,700 vs 2,100, a 21.1% lead for the Xeon Silver 4514Y that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 657 vs 14,000 (182.1% advantage for the Xeon Silver 4514Y). L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F vs 30 MB (total) on the Xeon Silver 4514Y.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Xeon Silver 4514Y |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 16 / 32+167% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+29% | 3.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz+25% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total) | 30 MB (total)+67% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+60% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-S (2022) | Emerald Rapids (2023) |
| PassMark | 19,532 | 30,621+57% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 12,380 | 22,000+78% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,700 | 2,100+24% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 657 | 14,000+2031% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-12400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Silver 4514Y uses LGA4677 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Xeon Silver 4514Y supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-12400F) vs 8 (Xeon Silver 4514Y). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-12400F) vs 80 (Xeon Silver 4514Y) — the Xeon Silver 4514Y offers 60 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-12400F) and C741 (Xeon Silver 4514Y).
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Xeon Silver 4514Y |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | DDR5-4400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 4096 GB+3100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 80+300% |
Advanced Features
Both support VT-x, VT-d, EPT virtualization. Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value, Xeon Silver 4514Y targets Mainstream Server / Virtualization. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600; Xeon Silver 4514Y rivals EPYC 8212.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Xeon Silver 4514Y |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Gaming Performance/Value | Mainstream Server / Virtualization |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












