PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-12400F vs Xeon W-2150B FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-12400F vs Xeon W-2150B: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-12400F

2022

Why buy it

✅+20.6% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅+30.9% larger total L3 cache (18 MB vs 14 MB).
✅Costs $325 less on MSRP ($174 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
✅Delivers 173.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 112.3 vs 41.1 PassMark/$ ($174 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 120W, a 55W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-2150B, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon W-2150B

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅140% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,410 vs 1,700).
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (11,463 vs 12,380).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (14 MB vs 18 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 41.1 vs 112.3 PassMark/$ ($499 MSRP vs $174 MSRP).
❌84.6% higher power demand at 120W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-12400F better than Xeon W-2150B?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon W-2150B makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-12400F is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-12400F is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-12400F is the stronger fit. You are getting 8% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 30.9% larger total L3 cache (18 MB vs 14 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-12400F is the better buy right now. Core i5-12400F comes in $325 cheaper on MSRP at $174 MSRP versus $499 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 173.4% better value on MSRP (112.3 vs 41.1 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-12400F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2017), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA2066, 30.9% larger total L3 cache (18 MB vs 14 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 10/20. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i5-12400F vs Xeon W-2150B Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-12400F

The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.

Xeon W-2150B

The Xeon W-2150B is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 13.75 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 20,486 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-12400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon W-2150B offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon W-2150B has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F versus 4.5 GHz on the Xeon W-2150B — a 2.2% clock advantage for the Xeon W-2150B (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i5-12400F uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon W-2150B uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12400F scores 19,532 against the Xeon W-2150B's 20,486 — a 4.8% lead for the Xeon W-2150B. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 12,380 vs 11,463 (7.7% advantage for the Core i5-12400F). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,700 vs 1,410, a 18.6% lead for the Core i5-12400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 657 vs 8,324 (170.7% advantage for the Xeon W-2150B). L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F vs 13.75 MB (total) on the Xeon W-2150B.

Feature	Core i5-12400F	Xeon W-2150B
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	10 / 20+67%
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz	4.5 GHz+2%
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	3 GHz+20%
L3 Cache	18 MB (total)+31%	13.75 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+25%	1 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Alder Lake-S (2022)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	19,532	20,486+5%
Cinebench R23 Multi	12,380+8%	11,463
Geekbench 6 Single	1,700+21%	1,410
Geekbench 6 Multi	657	8,324+1167%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-12400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W-2150B uses LGA2066 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-12400F versus DDR4-2666 on the Xeon W-2150B — the Core i5-12400F supports 80% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-2150B supports up to 512 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-12400F) vs 4 (Xeon W-2150B). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-12400F) vs 48 (Xeon W-2150B) — the Xeon W-2150B offers 28 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-12400F) and C422 (Xeon W-2150B).

Feature	Core i5-12400F	Xeon W-2150B
Socket	LGA1700	LGA2066
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+80%	DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	512 GB+300%
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	48+140%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon W-2150B). Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600.

Feature	Core i5-12400F	Xeon W-2150B
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Gaming Performance/Value	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-12400F was priced at $174, while the Xeon W-2150B came in at $499. On launch pricing ($174 vs $499), Core i5-12400F was $325 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-12400F delivers 112.3 pts/$ vs 41.1 pts/$ for the Xeon W-2150B — making the Core i5-12400F the 92.9% better value option.

Feature	Core i5-12400F	Xeon W-2150B
MSRP	$174-65%	$499
Performance per Dollar	112.3+173%	41.1
Release Date	2022	2017

Search Core i5-12400F on Amazon

Search Xeon W-2150B on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.