
Core i5-12500

Core i9-10900F
Core i5-12500 vs Core i9-10900F Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-12500 vs Core i9-10900F FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-12500 vs Core i9-10900F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-12500
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $252 less on MSRP ($212 MSRP vs $464 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 118.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 93.1 vs 42.7 PassMark/$ ($212 MSRP vs $464 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
- ✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while Core i9-10900F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-10900F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (12,978 vs 13,500).
Core i9-10900F
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +15.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 42.7 vs 93.1 PassMark/$ ($464 MSRP vs $212 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core i5-12500 moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-12500 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-10900F better than Core i5-12500?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-12500 vs Core i9-10900F Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-12500
The Core i5-12500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,739 points. Launch price was $299.

Core i9-10900F
The Core i9-10900F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 19,800 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i5-12500 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Core i9-10900F offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Core i9-10900F has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-12500 versus 5.1 GHz on the Core i9-10900F — a 10.3% clock advantage for the Core i9-10900F (base: 3 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core i5-12500 uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i9-10900F uses Comet Lake (2020−2025) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12500 scores 19,739 against the Core i9-10900F's 19,800 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i9-10900F. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 12,978 vs 13,500 (3.9% advantage for the Core i9-10900F). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,319 vs 1,701, a 30.7% lead for the Core i5-12500 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 9,003 vs 8,456 (6.3% advantage for the Core i5-12500). L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12500 vs 20 MB (total) on the Core i9-10900F.
| Feature | Core i5-12500 | Core i9-10900F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 10 / 20+67% |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz | 5.1 GHz+11% |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz+7% | 2.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total) | 20 MB (total)+11% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 256K (per core)+20380% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-S (2022) | Comet Lake (2020−2025) |
| PassMark | 19,739 | 19,800 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 12,978 | 13,500+4% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,319+36% | 1,701 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 9,003+6% | 8,456 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-12500 uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i9-10900F uses LGA1200 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-12500 versus DDR4-2933 on the Core i9-10900F — the Core i5-12500 supports 63.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-12500) vs 16 (Core i9-10900F) — the Core i5-12500 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-12500) and B460,H470,Z490,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i9-10900F).
| Feature | Core i5-12500 | Core i9-10900F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+64% | DDR4-2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 20+25% | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core i5-12500 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the Core i9-10900F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-12500 targets Productivity, Core i9-10900F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-12500 rivals Ryzen 5 5500; Core i9-10900F rivals Ryzen 7 3800X.
| Feature | Core i5-12500 | Core i9-10900F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 770 | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Productivity | Gaming |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-12500 was priced at $212, while the Core i9-10900F came in at $464. On launch pricing ($212 vs $464), Core i5-12500 was $252 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-12500 delivers 93.1 pts/$ vs 42.7 pts/$ for the Core i9-10900F — making the Core i5-12500 the 74.3% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-12500 | Core i9-10900F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $212-54% | $464 |
| Performance per Dollar | 93.1+118% | 42.7 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2020 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














