
Core i5-12500

Core Ultra 7 268V
Core i5-12500 vs Core Ultra 7 268V Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-12500 vs Core Ultra 7 268V FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-12500 vs Core Ultra 7 268V: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-12500
2022Why buy it
- ✅+21.8% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (18 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Costs $238 less on MSRP ($212 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 112.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 93.1 vs 43.8 PassMark/$ ($212 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
- ✅150% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (2,319 vs 2,437).
- ❌282.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 17W.
Core Ultra 7 268V
2024Why buy it
- ✅+5.1% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Draws 17W instead of 65W, a 48W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (10,653 vs 12,978).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 18 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 43.8 vs 93.1 PassMark/$ ($450 MSRP vs $212 MSRP).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12500.
Quick Answers
So, is Core Ultra 7 268V better than Core i5-12500?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-12500 vs Core Ultra 7 268V Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-12500
The Core i5-12500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,739 points. Launch price was $299.

Core Ultra 7 268V
The Core Ultra 7 268V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 September 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2.5 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2833. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 19,698 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i5-12500 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Core Ultra 7 268V offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the Core Ultra 7 268V has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-12500 versus 5 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 268V — a 8.3% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 268V (base: 3 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Core i5-12500 uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core Ultra 7 268V uses Lunar Lake (2024) (3 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12500 scores 19,739 against the Core Ultra 7 268V's 19,698 — a 0.2% lead for the Core i5-12500. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 12,978 vs 10,653 (19.7% advantage for the Core i5-12500). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,319 vs 2,437, a 5% lead for the Core Ultra 7 268V that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 9,003 vs 10,000 (10.5% advantage for the Core Ultra 7 268V). L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12500 vs 12 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 268V.
| Feature | Core i5-12500 | Core Ultra 7 268V |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 8+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz | 5 GHz+9% |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz+36% | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total)+50% | 12 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 2.5 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 3 nm-57% |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-S (2022) | Lunar Lake (2024) |
| PassMark | 19,739 | 19,698 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 12,978+22% | 10,653 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,319 | 2,437+5% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 9,003 | 10,000+11% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-12500 uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core Ultra 7 268V uses FCBGA2833 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-12500 versus LPDDR5x-8533 on the Core Ultra 7 268V — the Core Ultra 7 268V supports 77.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-12500 supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-12500) vs 8 (Core Ultra 7 268V) — the Core i5-12500 offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-12500) and SoC (Core Ultra 7 268V).
| Feature | Core i5-12500 | Core Ultra 7 268V |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FCBGA2833 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | LPDDR5x-8533+78% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+300% | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 20+150% | 8 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-12500) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core Ultra 7 268V). Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 770 (Core i5-12500) and Arc Graphics 140V (Core Ultra 7 268V) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-12500 targets Productivity, Core Ultra 7 268V targets Productivity. Direct competitor: Core i5-12500 rivals Ryzen 5 5500; Core Ultra 7 268V rivals Core Ultra 7 155H.
| Feature | Core i5-12500 | Core Ultra 7 268V |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 770 | Arc Graphics 140V |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Productivity | Productivity |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-12500 was priced at $212, while the Core Ultra 7 268V came in at $450. On launch pricing ($212 vs $450), Core i5-12500 was $238 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-12500 delivers 93.1 pts/$ vs 43.8 pts/$ for the Core Ultra 7 268V — making the Core i5-12500 the 72.1% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-12500 | Core Ultra 7 268V |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $212-53% | $450 |
| Performance per Dollar | 93.1+113% | 43.8 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2024 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














